Literature DB >> 32139098

Validation and application of dynamic biplane radiography to study in vivo ankle joint kinematics during high-demand activities.

Samuel Pitcairn1, Joseph Kromka1, MaCalus Hogan1, William Anderst2.   

Abstract

Ankle ligament injuries are the most common musculoskeletal injury in physically active populations. Failure to restore native kinematics post-injury often leads to long-term consequences including chronic instability and arthritis. Using traditional motion capture, it is difficult to distinguish independent motions of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints to assess the effects of injury, surgical repair, and rehabilitation on ankle joint complex (AJC) kinematics. Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of dynamic biplane radiography for determining in vivo AJC kinematics and arthrokinematics, and to identify sport-related movements that require the largest AJC range of motion (ROM) during support. Two subjects had three to five 1.0 mm diameter tantalum beads implanted into the tibia, fibula, talus, and calcaneus during lateral ankle ligament repair. Six months after surgery, the subjects executed seven movements while biplane radiographs were collected. Bone motion was tracked using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) as a "gold standard", and compared to a volumetric CT model-based tracking algorithm that matched digitally reconstructed radiographs to the original biplane radiographs. Over all movements, the average tibiotalar, subtalar and tibiofibular RMS errors were 0.5 mm ± 0.2 mm, 0.8 mm ± 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm ± 0.3 mm in translation and 1.4° ± 0.4°, 1.5° ± 0.5° and 1.7° ± 0.6° in rotation, respectively. Tibiotalar joint space was determined with an average precision of 0.5 mm. ROM results indicate that jumping and a forward-to-backward push-off movement are the best of the seven sport-related movements evaluated for eliciting full ROM kinematics.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biplane radiography; Foot and ankle; Kinematics; Validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139098     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  An automated method for defining anatomic coordinate systems in the hindfoot.

Authors:  Jessica A Brown; Tom Gale; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: Sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

Authors:  Shumeng Yang; Stephen P Canton; MaCalus V Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Transmission-Mode Ultrasound for Monitoring the Instantaneous Elastic Modulus of the Achilles Tendon During Unilateral Submaximal Vertical Hopping.

Authors:  Scott C Wearing; Larissa Kuhn; Torsten Pohl; Thomas Horstmann; Torsten Brauner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.