Lucie Allègre1, Geertje Callewaert2, Charles Coudray2, Christophe Demattei3, Laure Panel4, Caroline Carlier-Guerin5, Vincent Letouzey2, Renaud de Tayrac2, Brigitte Fatton2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France. lucie.allegre@chu-nimes.fr. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France. 3. Department of BESPIM (Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology), Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France. 4. Department of Gynecology, Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Camille Guérin Hospital, Châtellerault, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of new lightweight meshes in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery may reduce complications related to mesh retraction (chronic pain, dyspareunia, and mesh exposure). The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the area and position of Uphold Lite™ mesh 6 weeks and 12 months after anterior and/or apical prolapse repair. METHODS: This observational prospective multicenter study included patients who had undergone transvaginal surgery for symptomatic POP-Q stage ≥ II anterior and/or apical compartment prolapse with placement of Uphold Lite mesh. The dimensions and position of the mesh were evaluated at 6 weeks and 12 months by ultrasonography. Correlations between ultrasonographic mesh characteristics and POP recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty evaluable women with an average age of 66.8 years were included. No statistically significant difference in mesh area was found between week 6 and month 12 postoperatively, either at rest (1746.92 vs. 1574.48 mm2; p = 0.15) or on Valsalva (1568.81 vs. 1542.98 mm2; p = 0.65). The ROC-AUC of the distance between the mesh and the bladder neck (M-BN) at 6 weeks for predicting cystocele recurrence at 12 months was 0.764 (95% CI 0.573-0.955) at rest and 0.724 (95% CI 0.533-0.916) on Valsalva. An M-BN distance > 12.5 mm could predict cystocele recurrence at month 12 with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 69%. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic measurements of the Uphold Lite™ mesh appear to remain stable between 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. M-BN distance correlates with cystocele recurrence. These results appear to confirm the value of ultrasound in mesh evaluation.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of new lightweight meshes in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery may reduce complications related to mesh retraction (chronic pain, dyspareunia, and mesh exposure). The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the area and position of Uphold Lite™ mesh 6 weeks and 12 months after anterior and/or apical prolapse repair. METHODS: This observational prospective multicenter study included patients who had undergone transvaginal surgery for symptomatic POP-Q stage ≥ II anterior and/or apical compartment prolapse with placement of Uphold Lite mesh. The dimensions and position of the mesh were evaluated at 6 weeks and 12 months by ultrasonography. Correlations between ultrasonographic mesh characteristics and POP recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty evaluable women with an average age of 66.8 years were included. No statistically significant difference in mesh area was found between week 6 and month 12 postoperatively, either at rest (1746.92 vs. 1574.48 mm2; p = 0.15) or on Valsalva (1568.81 vs. 1542.98 mm2; p = 0.65). The ROC-AUC of the distance between the mesh and the bladder neck (M-BN) at 6 weeks for predicting cystocele recurrence at 12 months was 0.764 (95% CI 0.573-0.955) at rest and 0.724 (95% CI 0.533-0.916) on Valsalva. An M-BN distance > 12.5 mm could predict cystocele recurrence at month 12 with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 69%. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic measurements of the Uphold Lite™ mesh appear to remain stable between 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. M-BN distance correlates with cystocele recurrence. These results appear to confirm the value of ultrasound in mesh evaluation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mesh-related complications; Pelvic organ prolapse; Transvaginal mesh; Ultrasound
Authors: Daniel Altman; Tomi S Mikkola; Karl Möller Bek; Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo; Jonas Gunnarsson; Marie Ellström Engh; Christian Falconer Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 2.894