Literature DB >> 23749240

Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair.

A Rogowski1, P Bienkowski, A Tosiak, M Jerzak, P Mierzejewski, W Baranowski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present study was to determine possible correlations between mesh retraction after anterior vaginal mesh repair and de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB), and vaginal pain symptoms.
METHODS: One hundred and three women with symptomatic prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall, stages 3 and 4 based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, underwent Prolift anterior™ implantation. At a 6-month follow-up, the patients were interviewed for de novo SUI, OAB, and vaginal pain, and underwent an introital/transvaginal ultrasound examination to measure the mesh length in the midsagittal plane.
RESULTS: Mesh retraction was significantly larger in a subgroup of patients (n = 20; 19.4 %) presenting de novo OAB symptoms on the follow-up assessment compared with those without this complication (5.0 cm vs. 4.3 cm; p < 0.05). Mesh retraction was also significantly larger in a subgroup of patients (n = 23; 22.3 %) reporting postoperative vaginal pain compared with the women who did not report any postoperative vaginal pain (5.3 cm vs. 4.2 cm; p < 0.01). A significant correlation was found between mesh retraction and the severity of vaginal pain (R = 0.4, p < 0.01). Mesh retraction did not differ between patients with de novo SUI symptoms and those without this complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesh retraction assessed on ultrasound examination after anterior vaginal mesh repair may correlate with de novo OAB symptoms and vaginal pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23749240     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2131-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Joseph Lee; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Polypropylene vaginal mesh grafts in gynecology.

Authors:  Donald R Ostergard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  [Changing attitudes on the surgical treatment of urogenital prolapse: birth of the tension-free vaginal mesh].

Authors:  P Debodinance; J Berrocal; H Clavé; M Cosson; O Garbin; B Jacquetin; C Rosenthal; D Salet-Lizée; R Villet
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2004-11

Review 7.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients.

Authors:  Fréderic Caquant; Pierre Collinet; Philippe Debodinance; Juan Berrocal; Olivier Garbin; Claude Rosenthal; Henri Clave; Richard Villet; Bernard Jacquetin; Michel Cosson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  A prospective assessment of overactive bladder symptoms in a cohort of elderly women who underwent transvaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Raymond T Foster; Matthew D Barber; Marie Fidela R Parasio; Mark D Walters; Alison C Weidner; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-17
View more
  16 in total

1.  Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair: comment on Rogowski et al.

Authors:  B Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Retrospective comparison between the Prolift and Elevate anterior vaginal mesh procedures: 18-month clinical outcome.

Authors:  Artur Rogowski; Przemyslaw Bienkowski; Dariusz Tarwacki; Monika Szafarowska; Jerzy Samochowiec; Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz; Malgorzata Jerzak; Wlodzimierz Baranowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Clinical application of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh.

Authors:  Annika Taithongchai; Abdul H Sultan; Pawel A Wieczorek; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Mesh deformation: A mechanism underlying polypropylene prolapse mesh complications in vivo.

Authors:  Katrina M Knight; Gabrielle E King; Stacy L Palcsey; Amanda Suda; Rui Liang; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.633

5.  Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications.

Authors:  Alexis L Nolfi; Bryan N Brown; Rui Liang; Stacy L Palcsey; Michael J Bonidie; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Improvement in dyspareunia after vaginal mesh removal measured by a validated questionnaire.

Authors:  T Grisales; A L Ackerman; L J Rogo-Gupta; L Kwan; S Raz; L V Rodriguez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Effectiveness of Hyalobarrier and Seprafilm to prevent polypropylene mesh shrinkage: a macroscopic and histological experimental study.

Authors:  Erdogan Nohuz; Maher Alaboud; Claude Darcha; Abdelkrim Alloui; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Bernard Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Prospective ultrasonographic follow-up of transvaginal lightweight meshes: a 1-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Lucie Allègre; Geertje Callewaert; Charles Coudray; Christophe Demattei; Laure Panel; Caroline Carlier-Guerin; Vincent Letouzey; Renaud de Tayrac; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Assessing the use of the IUGA/ICS classification system for prosthesis/graft complications in publications from 2011 to 2015.

Authors:  Emily English; Megan Solomon; Bertha Chen; Lisa Rogo-Gupta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading.

Authors:  William R Barone; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.