Literature DB >> 12811296

What's new in prolapse surgery?

Bruno Deval1, François Haab.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are very many types of operation for the correction of symptomatic pelvic floor relaxation, and the pelvic surgeon is faced with a difficult task when selecting the most appropriate procedure(s) for an individual patient. Currently, the lifetime risk of undergoing prolapse or continence surgery in France is one in 11; up to 30% of patients will require repeat prolapse surgery, and 10% will require repeat continence surgery. Reconstructive pelvic surgery for the treatment of vaginal prolapse continues to evolve as surgeons continue their quest for a definitive surgical cure. This review looks at the etiology, presentation and current surgical management of genital prolapse in females. RECENT
FINDINGS: There are three primary routes of access in reconstructive pelvic surgery (abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic) for the repair of anterior, superior and posterior defects; the choice often depends on the surgeon's experience. Of the abdominal repairs, abdominal sacrocolpopexy with mesh remains the 'gold standard'; the retropubic paravaginal repair and laparoscopic techniques have not gained widespread acceptance. The laparoscopic approach appears to be the least utilized, because of the great degree of technical difficulty associated with laparoscopic suturing. Of the vaginal restorative procedures, uterosacral ligament vault suspension and iliococcygeous and sacrospinous fixation have their proponents. However, there is increasing interest in the use of biological prostheses (allografts/xenografts) and synthetic absorbable meshes.
SUMMARY: Randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the role of surgical procedures in reconstructive surgery, to determine which type of prosthesis is most suitable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811296     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200307000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  6 in total

1.  Significance of preoperative calculation of uterine weight as an indicator for preserving the uterus in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Qingsong Sheng; Ning Ma; Huijuan Huang; Bo Xu; Chunni He; Yanfeng Song
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

2.  Nitric oxide coating polypropylene mesh increases angiogenesis and reduces inflammatory response and apoptosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Prudente; Wágner José Favaro; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Cássio Luis Zanettini Riccetto
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Carolin Eva Hach; Joschka Krude; Andre Reitz; Michael Reiter; Axel Haferkamp; Stephan Buse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.

Authors:  M Neuman; Y Lavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-30

5.  Prospective ultrasonographic follow-up of transvaginal lightweight meshes: a 1-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Lucie Allègre; Geertje Callewaert; Charles Coudray; Christophe Demattei; Laure Panel; Caroline Carlier-Guerin; Vincent Letouzey; Renaud de Tayrac; Brigitte Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment.

Authors:  Simone Dos Reis Brandão da Silveira; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy-Di Bella; Fernanda Nastri; Miriam Goncalves Markos Kawabata; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Claudinei Alves Rodrigues; Edmund Chada Baracat; Antonio Pedro Flores Auge
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.