Literature DB >> 32797119

Clinical Performance and Role of Expert Supervision of Deep Learning for Cardiac Ventricular Volumetry: A Validation Study.

Tara A Retson1, Evan M Masutani1, Daniel Golden1, Albert Hsiao1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) algorithm for clinical measurement of right and left ventricular volume and function across cardiac MR images obtained for a range of clinical indications and pathologies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was conducted using the first 200 noncongenital clinical cardiac MRI examinations from June 2015 to June 2017 for which volumetry was available. Images were analyzed using commercially available software for automated DL-based and manual contouring of biventricular volumes. Fully automated measurements were compared using Pearson correlations, relative volume errors, and Bland-Altman analyses. Manual, automated, and expert revised contours for 50 MR images were examined by comparing regional Dice coefficients at the base, midventricle, and apex to further analyze the contour quality.
RESULTS: Fully automated and manual left ventricular volumes were strongly correlated for end-systolic volume (ESV: Pearson r = 0.99, P < .001), end-diastolic volume (EDV: r = 0.97, P < .001), and ejection fraction (EF: r = 0.94, P < .001). Right ventricular measurements were also correlated for ESV (r = 0.93, P < .001), EDV (r = 0.92, P < .001), and EF (r = 0.73, P < .001). Visual inspection of segmentation quality showed most errors (73%) occurred at the cardiac base. Mean Dice coefficients between manual, automated, and expert revised contours ranged from 0.92 to 0.95, with greatest variance at the base and apex.
CONCLUSION: Fully automated ventricular segmentation by the tested algorithm provides contours and ventricular volumes that could be used to aid expert segmentation, but can benefit from expert supervision, particularly to resolve errors at the basal and apical slices. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32797119      PMCID: PMC7392063          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  27 in total

1.  Segmentation of 4D cardiac MR images using a probabilistic atlas and the EM algorithm.

Authors:  Maria Lorenzo-Valdés; Gerardo I Sanchez-Ortiz; Andrew G Elkington; Raad H Mohiaddin; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Operator induced variability in left ventricular measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance is improved after training.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Lucy E Hudsmith; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Stefan Neubauer; Jane M Francis
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of right ventricle volumes, function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Oronzo Catalano; Serena Antonaci; Cristina Opasich; Guido Moro; Maria Mussida; Mariarosa Perotti; Giuseppe Calsamiglia; Mauro Frascaroli; Maurizia Baldi; Franco Cobelli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Automatic image-driven segmentation of the ventricles in cardiac cine MRI.

Authors:  Chris A Cocosco; Wiro J Niessen; Thomas Netsch; Evert-Jan P A Vonken; Gunnar Lund; Alexander Stork; Max A Viergever
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  The prognostic implications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Andrew S Flett; Mark A Westwood; L Ceri Davies; Anthony Mathur; James C Moon
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Automatic segmentation of the right ventricle from cardiac MRI using a learning-based approach.

Authors:  Michael R Avendi; Arash Kheradvar; Hamid Jafarkhani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Improved agreement between experienced and inexperienced observers using a standardized evaluation protocol for cardiac volumetry and infarct size measurement.

Authors:  M Groth; K Muellerleile; T Klink; D Säring; S Halaj; G Folwarski; M Kaul; P Bannas; G Adam; G K Lund
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2012-09-21

8.  Fully automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cine cardiac MRI using neural network regression.

Authors:  Li Kuo Tan; Robert A McLaughlin; Einly Lim; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Yih Miin Liew
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Comparison of long and short axis quantification of left ventricular volume parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, with ex-vivo validation.

Authors:  Helene Childs; Lucia Ma; Michael Ma; James Clarke; Myra Cocker; Jordin Green; Oliver Strohm; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence-An Updated Overview.

Authors:  Ștefan Busnatu; Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu; Alexandra Bolocan; George E D Petrescu; Dan Nicolae Păduraru; Iulian Năstasă; Mircea Lupușoru; Marius Geantă; Octavian Andronic; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu; Henrique Martins
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Machine Learning for Clinical Decision-Making: Challenges and Opportunities in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Sergio Sanchez-Martinez; Oscar Camara; Gemma Piella; Maja Cikes; Miguel Ángel González-Ballester; Marius Miron; Alfredo Vellido; Emilia Gómez; Alan G Fraser; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.