Li Kuo Tan1,2, Robert A McLaughlin3,4, Einly Lim5, Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz1,2, Yih Miin Liew5. 1. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2. University Malaya Research Imaging Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 4. Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricle (LV) structure and functions are the primary assessment performed in most clinical cardiac MRI protocols. Fully automated LV segmentation might improve the efficiency and reproducibility of clinical assessment. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a fully automated neural network regression-based algorithm for segmentation of the LV in cardiac MRI, with full coverage from apex to base across all cardiac phases, utilizing both short axis (SA) and long axis (LA) scans. STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional survey; diagnostic accuracy. SUBJECTS: In all, 200 subjects with coronary artery diseases and regional wall motion abnormalities from the public 2011 Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge (LVSC) database; 1140 subjects with a mix of normal and abnormal cardiac functions from the public Kaggle Second Annual Data Science Bowl database. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, steady-state free precession. ASSESSMENT: Reference standard data generated by experienced cardiac radiologists. Quantitative measurement and comparison via Jaccard and Dice index, modified Hausdorff distance (MHD), and blood volume. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-tests compared to previous work. RESULTS: Tested against the LVSC database, we obtained 0.77 ± 0.11 (Jaccard index) and 1.33 ± 0.71 mm (MHD), both metrics demonstrating statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) compared to previous work. Tested against the Kaggle database, the signed difference in evaluated blood volume was +7.2 ± 13.0 mL and -19.8 ± 18.8 mL for the end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) phases, respectively, with a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) for the ED phase. DATA CONCLUSION: A fully automated LV segmentation algorithm was developed and validated against a diverse set of cardiac cine MRI data sourced from multiple imaging centers and scanner types. The strong performance overall is suggestive of practical clinical utility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricle (LV) structure and functions are the primary assessment performed in most clinical cardiac MRI protocols. Fully automated LV segmentation might improve the efficiency and reproducibility of clinical assessment. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a fully automated neural network regression-based algorithm for segmentation of the LV in cardiac MRI, with full coverage from apex to base across all cardiac phases, utilizing both short axis (SA) and long axis (LA) scans. STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional survey; diagnostic accuracy. SUBJECTS: In all, 200 subjects with coronary artery diseases and regional wall motion abnormalities from the public 2011 Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge (LVSC) database; 1140 subjects with a mix of normal and abnormal cardiac functions from the public Kaggle Second Annual Data Science Bowl database. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, steady-state free precession. ASSESSMENT: Reference standard data generated by experienced cardiac radiologists. Quantitative measurement and comparison via Jaccard and Dice index, modified Hausdorff distance (MHD), and blood volume. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-tests compared to previous work. RESULTS: Tested against the LVSC database, we obtained 0.77 ± 0.11 (Jaccard index) and 1.33 ± 0.71 mm (MHD), both metrics demonstrating statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) compared to previous work. Tested against the Kaggle database, the signed difference in evaluated blood volume was +7.2 ± 13.0 mL and -19.8 ± 18.8 mL for the end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) phases, respectively, with a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) for the ED phase. DATA CONCLUSION: A fully automated LV segmentation algorithm was developed and validated against a diverse set of cardiac cine MRI data sourced from multiple imaging centers and scanner types. The strong performance overall is suggestive of practical clinical utility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Damini Dey; Piotr J Slomka; Paul Leeson; Dorin Comaniciu; Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas H Marwick Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Partho P Sengupta; Sirish Shrestha; Béatrice Berthon; Emmanuel Messas; Erwan Donal; Geoffrey H Tison; James K Min; Jan D'hooge; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Joel Dudley; Johan W Verjans; Khader Shameer; Kipp Johnson; Lasse Lovstakken; Mahdi Tabassian; Marco Piccirilli; Mathieu Pernot; Naveena Yanamala; Nicolas Duchateau; Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Olivier Bernard; Piotr Slomka; Rahul Deo; Rima Arnaout Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-09