Literature DB >> 34099240

To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Hsin-Hung Li1, Nina M Hanning2, Marisa Carrasco3.   

Abstract

Attention is a central neural process that enables selective and efficient processing of visual information. Individuals can attend to specific visual information either overtly, by making an eye movement to an object of interest, or covertly, without moving their eyes. We review behavioral, neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and computational evidence of presaccadic attentional modulations that occur while preparing saccadic eye movements, and highlight their differences from those of covert spatial endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary) attention. We discuss recent studies and experimental procedures on how these different types of attention impact visual performance, alter appearance, differentially modulate the featural representation of basic visual dimensions (orientation and spatial frequency), engage different neural computations, and recruit partially distinct neural substrates. We conclude that presaccadic attention and covert attention are dissociable.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast; endogenous attention; exogenous attention; eye movements; featural representation; orientation; spatial frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099240      PMCID: PMC8552810          DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   16.978


  148 in total

1.  Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Nabil Filali-Sadouk; Eric Castet; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Zenon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Receptive field shift and shrinkage in macaque middle temporal area through attentional gain modulation.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Stefan Treue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual representations during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  T Moore; A S Tolias; P H Schiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

6.  Eye movements and attention: the role of pre-saccadic shifts of attention in perception, memory and the control of saccades.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Timothy M Gersch; Brian S Schnitzer; Barbara A Dosher; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Establishing the separable contributions of spatial attention and saccade preparation across tasks with varying acuity demands.

Authors:  Samantha Parker; Andrew Heathcote; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial attention during saccade decisions.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Anna Klapetek; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Emotion and anxiety potentiate the way attention alters visual appearance.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Foveal vision anticipates defining features of eye movement targets.

Authors:  Lisa M Kroell; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Presaccadic attention enhances contrast sensitivity, but not at the upper vertical meridian.

Authors:  Nina M Hanning; Marc M Himmelberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Microsaccades as a marker not a cause for attention-related modulation.

Authors:  Gongchen Yu; James P Herman; Leor N Katz; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Conventional and HD-tDCS May (or May Not) Modulate Overt Attentional Orienting: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Approach and Methodological Reflections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Diana; Giulia Scotti; Edoardo N Aiello; Patrick Pilastro; Aleksandra K Eberhard-Moscicka; René M Müri; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.