Literature DB >> 520439

An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor.

J Rovamo, V Virsu.   

Abstract

Comparisons of the published data on the density D of receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells and on the cortical magnification factor M indicated that M2 is directly proportional to D in primates. Therefore, the human M can be estimated for the principal meridians of the visual field from the density-distribution of retinal ganglion cells and from the density of the centralmost cones. Using the previously published empirical data, we estimated the values of the human M and express the values in four simple equations that can be used for finding the value of M for any location of the visual field. The monocular values of M are not radially symmetric. These analytically expressed values of M make it possible to predict contrast sensitivity and resolution for any location of the visual field. We measured contrast sensitivity functions at 25 different locations and found that the functions could be made similar by scaling the retinal dimensions of test gratings by the inverse values of M. Visual acuity and resolution could be predicted accurately for all retinal locations by means of a single constant multiplier of the estimated M. The results indicate that the functional and structural properties of the visual system are very closely and similarly related across the whole retina. Visual acuity, e.g., bears the same optimal relation to the density of sampling executed by retinal ganglion cells at all locations of the visual fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 520439     DOI: 10.1007/BF00236819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  The representation of the visual field in the lateral geniculate nucleus of Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  J G Malpeli; F H Baker
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution.

Authors:  F W WEYMOUTH
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The laminar organization and cell content of the lateral geniculate body in the monkey.

Authors:  W E le Gros Clark
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1941-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S M Zeki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye.

Authors:  N Drasdo; C W Fowler
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The neural representation of visual space.

Authors:  A Hughes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; M A Bouman; A E Bueno de Mesquita; S Slappendel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1978-06

9.  Morphology of the primate optic nerve. I. Method and total fiber count.

Authors:  A M Potts; D Hodges; C B Shelman; K J Fritz; N S Levy; Y Mangnall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-12

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  118 in total

1.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C P Talgar; E L Cameron
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2001

2.  Topography of the chromatic pattern-onset VEP.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Peter B Delahunt; Michael A Crognale; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Relationship between motion VEP and perceived velocity of gratings: effects of stimulus speed and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Rolf Müller; Gunder Bochmann; Mark W Greenlee; Edith Göpfert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Deficits in reach target selection during inactivation of the midbrain superior colliculus.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert D Rafal; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; S Christman; J B Hellige
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

8.  The human motion VEP as a function of size and eccentricity of the stimulation field.

Authors:  R Müller; E Göpfert; L Schlykowa; D Anke
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Effects of distractors on the perception of right angles.

Authors:  A Bulatov; A Bertulis; A Bieliavicius; E Loginovic
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-08

10.  Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye field results in curved saccades.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.