Literature DB >> 11682339

The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

T Kammer1, S Beck, M Erb, W Grodd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the occipital cortex as a function of induced current direction.
METHODS: Phosphene thresholds were determined in 6 subjects. We compared two stimulator types (Medtronic-Dantec and Magstim) with monophasic pulses using the standard figure-of-eight coils and systematically varied hemisphere (left and right) and induced current direction (latero-medial and medio-lateral). Each measurement was made 3 times, with a new stimulation site chosen for each repetition. Only those stimulation sites were investigated where phosphenes were restricted to one visual hemifield. Coil positions were stereotactically registered. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of retinotopic areas was performed in 5 subjects to individually characterize the borders of visual areas; TMS stimulation sites were coregistered with respect to visual areas.
RESULTS: Despite large interindividual variance we found a consistent pattern of phosphene thresholds. They were significantly lower if the direction of the induced current was oriented from lateral to medial in the occipital lobe rather than vice versa. No difference with respect to the hemisphere was found. Threshold values normalized to the square root of the stored energy in the stimulators were lower with the Medtronic-Dantec device than with the Magstim device. fMRI revealed that stimulation sites generating unilateral phosphenes were situated at V2 and V3. Variability of phosphene thresholds was low within a cortical patch of 2x2cm(2). Stimulation over V1 yields phosphenes in both visual fields.
CONCLUSIONS: The excitability of visual cortical areas depends on the direction of the induced current with a preference for latero-medial currents. Although the coil positions used in this study were centered over visual areas V2 and V3, we cannot rule out the possibility that subcortical structures or V1 could actually be the main generator for phosphenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11682339     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00673-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  50 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh; Kai V Thilo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of phosphene perception during saccadic eye movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study of the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Chadwick Boulay; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Choi Deblieck; Benjamin Thompson; Marco Iacoboni; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The sound-induced phosphene illusion.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Silvia Convento; Martina Fusaro; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Evoked potentials in large-scale cortical networks elicited by TMS of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Javier O Garcia; Emily D Grossman; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.