| Literature DB >> 32787784 |
Weiji Xie1, Jing Xu1, Yi Xie1, Zhijun Lin1, Xiaochang Xu2, Xialan Zhang3, Yimin Zhang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is the primary biopsy technique and it was used by 16G needles or 18G needles in China, but there is controversy about the effect and safety of the two different diameters. The study aims to compare the adequacy, complication rate and pathological classification when using 18G vs. 16G needles to perform renal biopsy with ultrasound-guidedance on native kidneys in Chinese individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Adequacy; Complication; Needles; Percutaneous; Renal biopsy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32787784 PMCID: PMC7424979 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01987-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Baseline demographic and laboratory features in the 18G and 16G groups
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 38 (53%) | 114 (58%) | |
| Female | 34 (47%) | 84 (42%) | 0.482 |
| Age | 41 ± 16 | 40 ± 16 | 0.756 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 255 ± 242 | 216 ± 316 | 0.11 |
| Hemoglobin(g/L) | 116 ± 28 | 118 ± 26 | 0.394 |
| Platelets number(*10E9/L) | 231 ± 82 | 248 ± 88 | 0.084 |
| PT | 12 ± 1.8 | 13 ± 1.2 | 0.279 |
| APTT | 28 ± 5.5 | 29 ± 4.7 | 0.466 |
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 3.3 ± 4.3 | 3.2 ± 4.2 | 0.821 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.73 ± 5.19 | 23.71 ± 4.29 | 0.991 |
PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time
Adequacy of renal biopsy
| 18G | 16G | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM | 24 ± 11 | 25 ± 11 | 0.265 |
| IF | 3 ± 2 | 5 ± 3 | 0.003 |
| LM ≥10 | 65 (90.28%) | 186 (93.94%) | 0.298 |
LM Light microscopy glomeruli count, IF Immunofluorescence microscopy glomeruli count
Length of kidney biopsy core
| 18G | 16G | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total core (cm) | 2.30 ± 0.58 | 2.29 ± 0.44 | 0.411 |
| IF core (cm) | 0.22 ± 0.14 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.054 |
IF Immunofluorescence microscopy glomeruli
Comparative analysis of biopsy complications N(%)
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor complications | |||
| lumbar or abdominal pain | 3 (4.17%) | 14 (7.07%) | 0.572 |
| gross hematuria | 3 (4.17%) | 6 (3.03%) | 0.704 |
| perinephric hematoma without symptoms | 3 (4.17%) | 3 (1.52%) | 0.195 |
| serious complications | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.02%) | 1 |
| Total complications | 9 (12.5%) | 25 (12.63%) | 1 |
| Total number | 72 | 198 | |
Comparative analysis of disease spectrum N (%)
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IgA nephropathy | 25 (34.72%) | 62 (31.31%) | 0.659 |
| Membranous nephropathy | 12 (16.67%) | 42 (21.21%) | 0.493 |
| Minimal change disease | 3 (4.17%) | 20 (10.10%) | 0.145 |
| Lupus Nephritis | 10 (16.67%) | 15 (7.58%) | 0.038 |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 5 (6.94%) | 10 (5.05%) | 0.554 |
| FSGS | 2 (2.78%) | 8 (4.04%) | 1 |
| Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis | 1 (1.39%) | 6 (3.03%) | 0.679 |
| Crescentic glomerulonephritis | 4 (5.56%) | 3 (1.52%) | 0.084 |
| Acute tubulointerstitial injury | 2 (2.78%) | 7 (3.54%) | 1 |
| Hypertension nephropathy | 2 (2.78%) | 1 (0.51%) | 0.174 |
| Chronic sclerosing glomerulonephritis | 3 (4.17%) | 2 (1.01%) | 0.12 |
| Endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis | 1 (1.39%) | 2 (1.01%) | 1 |
| Anaphylatic purpura nephritis | 1 (1.39%) | 1 (0.51%) | 0.463 |
| Othersa | 1 (1.39%) | 19 (9.6%) | 0.019 |
aOthers: minor glomerular abnormalities, renal amyloidosis, ischemic renal injury, immunotactoid glomerulopathy, idiopathic nodular mesangial sclerosis, transplant nephropathy, thrombotic microvascular disease due to scleroderma, Alport syndrome, focal necrotic glomerulonephritis
Comparative analysis of IgAN classification (SMK Lee classifications) N (%)
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I | 0 | 0 | |
| Grade II | 0 | 7 (11.29%) | 0.185 |
| Grade III | 8 (32%) | 26 (41.94%) | 0.471 |
| Grade IV | 12 (48%) | 15 (24.19%) | 0.041 |
| Grade V | 5 (20%) | 14 (22.58%) | 1 |
Comparative analysis of IgAN classification (Oxford classificationa, 2017) N (%)
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 25 (100%) | 61 (100%) | 1 |
| E1 | 7 (28%) | 25 (40.98%) | 0.329 |
| S1 | 13 (52%) | 15 (24.59%) | 0.022 |
| T1 | 7 (28%) | 9 (14.75%) | 0.221 |
| T2 | 4 (16%) | 12 (19.67%) | 0.77 |
| C1 | 4 (16%) | 8 (13.11%) | 0.739 |
| C2 | 3 (12%) | 10 (16.39%) | 0.748 |
aThe Oxford classification consisted of mesangial hypercellularity (M0, mesangial score ≤ 0.5; M1, mesangial score > 0.5), endocapillary hypercellularity (E0, absent; E1, present), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S0, absent; S1, present), tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T0, ≤25%; T1, 26–50%; T2, > 50%), and cellular/fibrocellular crescents (C0, absent; C1, < 25%; C2, ≥25%)
Comparative analysis of lupus nephritis classification (the ISN/RPS classification, 2003) N (%)
| 18G | 16G | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Class II | 0 (0%) | 3 (20%) | 0.25 |
| Class III | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Class IV | 2 (20%) | 3 (20%) | 1 |
| Class V | 0 (0%) | 2 (13.33%) | 0.5 |
| Class VI | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Class III + V | 3 (30%) | 1 (6.67%) | 0.267 |
| Class IV + V | 5 (50%) | 6 (40%) | 0.697 |