Michael P Leathers1, Marc N Ialenti2, Brian T Feeley2, Alan L Zhang2, C Benjamin Ma2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: mike.leathers@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As surgeons have become more adept and midterm to long-term results have demonstrated improved patient outcomes, the indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded. This study compares the clinical outcomes and complication rates between patients 65 years and younger and patients 70 years and older undergoing RTSA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed at a single institution. Patient demographic data, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, patient satisfaction, notching, and complication rates were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 32 patients (57 ± 4.9 years old) in the 65 years and younger group, whereas 50 patients (76 ± 4.9 years old) were in the 70 years and older group. The mean follow-up time was 3 years (range, 2-8 years). There were no significant differences in preoperative, postoperative, or change in ASES scores between the younger and older groups. Postoperatively, the younger cohort achieved a higher degree (mean) of forward flexion (133° vs. 117°), abduction (127° vs. 110°), and external rotation (40° vs. 27°) (P < .05). The average improvement in forward flexion and external rotation was also found to be larger in the younger cohort (P < .05). The younger and older groups had comparable complication rates, notching rates, and overall satisfaction rates. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes scores and complication rates after RTSA of patients aged 65 years and younger were similar to those of patients aged 70 years and older. However, younger patients were able to achieve increased postoperative range of motion.
BACKGROUND: As surgeons have become more adept and midterm to long-term results have demonstrated improved patient outcomes, the indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded. This study compares the clinical outcomes and complication rates between patients 65 years and younger and patients 70 years and older undergoing RTSA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed at a single institution. Patient demographic data, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, patient satisfaction, notching, and complication rates were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 32 patients (57 ± 4.9 years old) in the 65 years and younger group, whereas 50 patients (76 ± 4.9 years old) were in the 70 years and older group. The mean follow-up time was 3 years (range, 2-8 years). There were no significant differences in preoperative, postoperative, or change in ASES scores between the younger and older groups. Postoperatively, the younger cohort achieved a higher degree (mean) of forward flexion (133° vs. 117°), abduction (127° vs. 110°), and external rotation (40° vs. 27°) (P < .05). The average improvement in forward flexion and external rotation was also found to be larger in the younger cohort (P < .05). The younger and older groups had comparable complication rates, notching rates, and overall satisfaction rates. CONCLUSION:Patient-reported outcomes scores and complication rates after RTSA of patients aged 65 years and younger were similar to those of patients aged 70 years and older. However, younger patients were able to achieve increased postoperative range of motion.
Authors: Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-02
Authors: Bradley S Schoch; Joseph J King; Thomas W Wright; Stephen F Brockmeier; Jean-David Werthel; Brian C Werner Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2022-03-10
Authors: Mikaël Chelli; Lucas Lo Cunsolo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-François Gonzalez; Peter Domos; Nicolas Bronsard; Pascal Boileau Journal: JSES Open Access Date: 2019-09-11
Authors: Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta Journal: JSES Int Date: 2020-09-07
Authors: Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta Journal: JSES Int Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: Cameron R Guy; Bradley S Schoch; Robert Frantz; Thomas W Wright; Aimee M Struk; Kevin W Farmer; Joseph J King Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-12-23
Authors: Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.019