Literature DB >> 28132087

Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI.

Jin Hwan Ahn1, Yong Seuk Lee2, Hwa Jae Jeong1, Jai Hyung Park1, Yohan Cho1, Kwang-Jeong Kim3, Taeg Su Ko4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to compare ACL graft maturation and morphologies using MRI between trans-tibial (TT) and retrograde outside-in (OI) techniques, and to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients underwent single-tunnel ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring autografts, with the TT technique used on 42 patients (TT group) and the retrograde OI technique used on 39 patients (OI group). All patients were examined with 3 T MRI at 6 months (between 5 and 7 months) after surgery. The signal intensity of the reconstructed graft was analyzed and compared between the two groups, using the signal/noise quotient (SNQ), the orientation of the ACL graft and the tibial tunnel location of the graft. The SNQ value is indicative of graft maturation, and the orientation of the graft and the tibial tunnel location of the graft represent graft morphology. Clinical evaluation was performed before the surgery and 2 years or more after the surgery.
RESULTS: The mean SNQ value of the TT group was significantly (P = 0.030) lower than that of the OI group. The mean sagittal ACL angle (P < 0.001) and the mean coronal ACL angle (P < 0.001) were more vertical in the TT group. The tibial tunnel aperture was located at a significantly (P < 0.001) more posterior position in the TT group. There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical results between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The OI technique showed a more anteriorly positioned tibial tunnel and a more oblique graft orientation in both sagittal and coronal planes. However, in comparison with the TT group, a significantly higher SNQ value was noticed in the follow-up MRI of the OI group at 6 months, although clinical results of the two groups were not significantly different during at least the 2-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Outside-in technique; Signal/noise quotient; Trans-tibial technique

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132087     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2606-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  No difference in graft healing or clinical outcome between trans-portal and outside-in techniques after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae-Ang Sim; Jong-Min Kim; SahngHoon Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Superior graft maturation after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial drilling technique compared to the transportal technique.

Authors:  Masahiko Saito; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yorikazu Akatsu; Tsutomu Inaoka; Junichi Iwasaki; Tsuguo Morikawa; Atsuya Watanabe; Yasuchika Aoki; Takahisa Sasho; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effect of Joint Infection After Arthroscopic Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Tendon: A Retrospective Matched MRI Study.

Authors:  Nayun Chen; Cheng Wang; Dai Li; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-14

4.  No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiahao Zhang; Yong Ma; Chaonan Pang; Haijun Wang; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament grafts display differential maturation patterns on magnetic resonance imaging following reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Panos; Kate E Webster; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Biying Huang; Wenyu Deng; Tao Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 7.  Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Maturity With Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dyck; Katja Zazulia; Céline Smekens; Christiaan H W Heusdens; Thomas Janssens; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.