Literature DB >> 29065271

Hamstring Graft Incorporation According to the Length of the Graft Inside Tunnels.

Etienne Cavaignac1, Vincent Marot1, Marie Faruch2, Nicolas Reina1, Jérôme Murgier1, Franck Accadbled3, Emilie Berard4, Philippe Chiron1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus (ST4) graft is an evolution of the standard technique with 2 hamstring tendons (semitendinosus + gracilis [STG]). However, there is no published comparison of how well these 2 types of hamstring grafts are incorporated into the bone tunnels. Because the ST4 graft is shorter, there is less graft material inside the tunnels.
PURPOSE: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare graft incorporation in the tibial bone tunnels 1 year after ACL reconstruction with either an STG graft or ST4 graft. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively: 31 with an ST4 graft and 31 with an STG graft. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Graft incorporation and ligamentization were evaluated with MRI after 1 year of follow-up. The following parameters were evaluated: signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), tibial tunnel enlargement, signal intensity at the bone-graft interface, and graft signal according to the Howell scale. The number of participants needed to show that the mean SNQ did not differ between the 2 techniques was 31 in each group (with a 1-sided alpha of 2.5% and a 1-sided beta of 10.0%). The Student t test was used to compare the distribution of continuous secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: The mean SNQ was 5.2 ± 4.5 for the STG group and 5.9 ± 3.7 for the ST4 group ( P = .5100). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 93.7% ± 51.7% for the STG group versus 80.0% ± 42.9% for the ST4 group ( P = .2605). The groups did not differ in signal intensity at the bone-graft interface ( P = .7502) or in graft signal according to the Howell scale ( P = .4544).
CONCLUSION: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, incorporation and ligamentization of the STG and ST4 grafts were the same based on MRI analysis. The results were at least as good with the ST4 technique as with the standard STG technique in terms of incorporation and ligamentization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; ST4; graft incorporation; ligamentization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29065271     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517733472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

Authors:  Sven Putnis; Thomas Neri; Samuel Grasso; James Linklater; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Graft bending angle affects allograft tendon maturity early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Linhai Chen; Yibing Wu; Guanghao Lin; Peng Wei; Zaohui Ye; Yangjian Wang; Tiantian Ren
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Intra-femoral tunnel graft lengths less than 20 mm do not predispose to early graft failure, inferior outcomes or poor function. A prospective clinico-radiological comparative study.

Authors:  P K Gupta; A Acharya; V Khanna; A Mourya
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 4.  Tibial tunnel expansion does not correlate with four-strand graft maturation after ACL reconstruction using adjustable cortical suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Alexandre Biset; Adil Douiri; James R Robinson; Pierre Laboudie; Philippe Colombet; Nicolas Graveleau; Nicolas Bouguennec
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Effect of Joint Infection After Arthroscopic Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Tendon: A Retrospective Matched MRI Study.

Authors:  Nayun Chen; Cheng Wang; Dai Li; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-14

6.  Effect of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Incorporation.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Timothée Mesnier; Vincent Marot; Andrea Fernandez; Marie Faruch; Emilie Berard; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-30

7.  No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiahao Zhang; Yong Ma; Chaonan Pang; Haijun Wang; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Maturity With Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dyck; Katja Zazulia; Céline Smekens; Christiaan H W Heusdens; Thomas Janssens; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-03

9.  Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous 2-Strand Gracilis Graft.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Marie Castoldi; Vincent Marot; Louis Courtot; Gauthier Gracia; Nicolas Reina
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-06-05

10.  Influence of femoral tunnel exit on the 3D graft bending angle in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Sylvano Mania; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Philipp Fürnstahl; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.