Literature DB >> 32755168

Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Detection of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison With mpMRI.

Sonia Gaur1,2, Esther Mena1, Stephanie A Harmon3, Maria L Lindenberg1, Stephen Adler3, Anita T Ton1, Joanna H Shih4, Sherif Mehralivand5, Maria J Merino6, Bradford J Wood7, Peter A Pinto5, Ronnie C Mease8, Martin G Pomper8, Peter L Choyke1, Baris Turkbey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of PET with (2S)-2-[[(1S)-1-carboxy-5-[(6-(18F)fluoranylpyridine-3-carbonyl)amino]pentyl]carbamoylamino]pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL), a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracer, in the detection of high-risk localized prostate cancer as compared with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This HIPAA-compliant prospective study included 26 consecutive patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer (median age, 69.5 years [range, 53-81 years]; median prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, 18.88 ng/mL [range, 1.03-20.00 ng/mL]) imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and mpMRI. Images from PET/CT and mpMRI were evaluated separately, and suspicious areas underwent targeted biopsy. Lesion-based sensitivity and tumor detection rate were compared for PSMA PET and mpMRI. Standardized uptake value (SUV) and PSMA PET parameters were correlated with histopathology score, and uptake in tumor was compared with that in nonmalignant tissue. On a patient level, SUV and PSMA tumor volume were correlated with PSA density. RESULTS. Forty-four tumors (one in Gleason grade [GG] group 1, 12 in GG group 2, seven in GG group 3, nine in GG group 4, and 15 in GG group 5) were identified at histopathology. Sensitivity and tumor detection rate of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and mpMRI were similar (PET/CT, 90.9% and 80%; mpMRI, 86.4% and 88.4%; p = 0.58/0.17). Total lesion PSMA and PSMA tumor volume showed a relationship with GG (τ = 0.27 and p = 0.08, τ = 0.30 and p = 0.06, respectively). Maximum SUV in tumor was significantly higher than that in nonmalignant tissue (p < 0.05). Tumor burden density moderately correlated with PSA density (r = 0.47, p = 0.01). Five true-positive tumors identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were not identified on mpMRI. CONCLUSION. In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT is highly sensitive in detecting intraprostatic tumors and can detect tumors missed on mpMRI. Measured uptake is significantly higher in tumor tissue, and PSMA-derived tumor burden is associated with severity of disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; PET; multiparametric MRI; prostate; prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32755168      PMCID: PMC8974973          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  44 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes.

Authors:  Findlay MacAskill; Su-Min Lee; David Eldred-Evans; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Rick Popert; Konrad Wolfe; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Giles Rottenberg; Sidath H Liyanage; Peter Acher
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  18F-DCFBC Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted PET/CT Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer: Correlation With Multiparametric MRI and Histopathology.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Stephen Adler; Sandra Bednarova; Rose Berman; Anita T Ton; Yolanda McKinney; Philip Eclarinal; Craig Hill; George Afari; Sibaprasad Bhattacharyya; Ronnie C Mease; Maria J Merino; Paula M Jacobs; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Martin G Pomper; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Initial Evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Zsolt Szabo; Esther Mena; Steven P Rowe; Donika Plyku; Rosa Nidal; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hong Fan; Robert F Dannals; Ying Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Melin Vranesic; Akrita Bhatnagar; George Sgouros; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Initial Experience with Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for Assessment of Whole-Body Tumor Burden as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Schmuck; Christoph A von Klot; Christoph Henkenberens; Jan M Sohns; Hans Christiansen; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel; Thorsten Derlin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues.

Authors:  G L Wright; C Haley; M L Beckett; P F Schellhammer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Sandra Bednarova; Joanna H Shih; Francesca V Mertan; Sonia Gaur; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Steven P Rowe; Jeremie Calais; Michael S Hofman; Tobias Maurer; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Clemens Kratowchil; Ken Herrmann; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Quantitative assessment of global hepatic glycolysis in patients with cirrhosis and normal controls using 18F-FDG-PET/CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ana Hernandez-Martinez; Victor A Marin-Oyaga; Ali Salavati; Babak Saboury; Ion Codreanu; Marnix G E H Lam; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Prostate Biopsy Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Aytekin Oto; Sandra Bednarova; Jeffrey W Nix; John V Thomas; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Sonia Gaur; Stephanie A Harmon; Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Novel Preclinical and Radiopharmaceutical Aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: A New PET Tracer for Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Eder; Oliver Neels; Miriam Müller; Ulrike Bauder-Wüst; Yvonne Remde; Martin Schäfer; Ute Hennrich; Michael Eisenhut; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Uwe Haberkorn; Klaus Kopka
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-30
View more
  7 in total

1.  18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Divya Yadav; Hyunsoo Hwang; Wei Qiao; Rituraj Upadhyay; Brian F Chapin; Chad Tang; Ana Aparicio; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Stella K Kang; Homer A Macapinlac; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Devaki Shilpa Surasi
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Translating a radiolabeled imaging agent to the clinic.

Authors:  Gary L Griffiths; Crystal Vasquez; Freddy Escorcia; Jeff Clanton; Liza Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Mars Shot for Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Molecularly Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Bonnie Clarke; Alexander Drzezga; Liza Lindenberg; Arman Rahmim; James Thackeray; Gary A Ulaner; Wolfgang Weber; Katherine Zukotynski; John Sunderland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  Value of Targeted Biopsies and Combined PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI Imaging in Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Primary Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marnix Rasing; Marieke van Son; Marinus Moerland; Bart de Keizer; Frank Wessels; Trudy Jonges; Sandrine van de Pol; Wietse Eppinga; Juus Noteboom; Jan Lagendijk; Jochem van der Voort van Zijp; Max Peters
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Imaging Biomarkers in Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Review and Clinical Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Andrew Loblaw; David Laidley; Hatim Fakir; Lucas Mendez; Melanie Davidson; Zahra Kassam; Ting-Yim Lee; Aaron Ward; Jonathan Thiessen; Jane Bayani; John Conyngham; Laura Bailey; Joseph D Andrews; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) in Urologic Cancers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukushima; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Aki Furusawa; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  PEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vy Tran; Anne Hong; Tom Sutherland; Kim Taubman; Su-Faye Lee; Daniel Lenaghan; Kapil Sethi; Niall M Corcoran; Nathan Lawrentschuk; H Woo; Lisa Tarlinton; Damien Bolton; Tim Spelman; Lauren Thomas; Russell Booth; Justin Hegarty; Elisa Perry; Lih-Ming Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.