Sebastian Schmuck1, Christoph A von Klot2, Christoph Henkenberens3, Jan M Sohns1, Hans Christiansen3, Hans-Jürgen Wester4, Tobias L Ross1, Frank M Bengel1, Thorsten Derlin5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 2. Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; and. 4. Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany Derlin.Thorsten@mh-hannover.de.
Abstract
A quantitative imaging biomarker is desirable to provide a comprehensive measure of whole-body tumor burden in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and to standardize the evaluation of treatment-related changes. Therefore, we evaluated whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand PET/CT may be applied to provide PSMA-derived volumetric parameters for quantification of whole-body tumor burden. Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT because of increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs. Volumetric parameters, that is, PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), were calculated for each patient using a 3-dimensional segmentation and computerized volumetry technique and compared with serum PSA levels. In a group of 10 patients, volumetric parameters were applied for treatment monitoring. Results: Volumetric parameters, that is, whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA, demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with PSA levels (P < 0.0001) as a surrogate marker of tumor burden, whereas SUVmax (P = 0.22) or SUVmean (P = 0.45) did not. Treatment response and treatment failure were paralleled by concordant changes in both whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA (P = 0.02), whereas neither the change in SUVmax (P = 1.0) nor the change in SUVmean (P = 1.0) concordantly paralleled changes in PSA levels. Conclusion: PSMA-derived volumetric parameters provide a quantitative imaging biomarker for whole-body tumor burden, capable of standardizing quantitative changes in PET imaging of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and of facilitating therapy monitoring.
A quantitative imaging biomarker is desirable to provide a comprehensive measure of whole-body tumor burden in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and to standardize the evaluation of treatment-related changes. Therefore, we evaluated whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand PET/CT may be applied to provide PSMA-derived volumetric parameters for quantification of whole-body tumor burden. Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT because of increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs. Volumetric parameters, that is, PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), were calculated for each patient using a 3-dimensional segmentation and computerized volumetry technique and compared with serum PSA levels. In a group of 10 patients, volumetric parameters were applied for treatment monitoring. Results: Volumetric parameters, that is, whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA, demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with PSA levels (P < 0.0001) as a surrogate marker of tumor burden, whereas SUVmax (P = 0.22) or SUVmean (P = 0.45) did not. Treatment response and treatment failure were paralleled by concordant changes in both whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA (P = 0.02), whereas neither the change in SUVmax (P = 1.0) nor the change in SUVmean (P = 1.0) concordantly paralleled changes in PSA levels. Conclusion:PSMA-derived volumetric parameters provide a quantitative imaging biomarker for whole-body tumor burden, capable of standardizing quantitative changes in PET imaging of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and of facilitating therapy monitoring.
Authors: Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Johanna Zörgiebel; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; Katja Hueper; Christoph A von Klot; Christoph Henkenberens; Hans Christiansen; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-01-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Mehrbod S Javadi; Jeffrey P Leal; Takahiro Higuchi; Kenneth J Pienta; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christian Schmidkonz; Michael Cordes; Daniela Schmidt; Tobias Bäuerle; Theresa Ida Goetz; Michael Beck; Olaf Prante; Alexander Cavallaro; Michael Uder; Bernd Wullich; Peter Goebell; Torsten Kuwert; Philipp Ritt Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrei Gafita; Marie Bieth; Markus Krönke; Giles Tetteh; Fernando Navarro; Hui Wang; Elisabeth Günther; Bjoern Menze; Wolfgang A Weber; Matthias Eiber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Daniel Walacides; Astrid Meier; Anne Caroline Knöchelmann; Daniele Meinecke; Thorsten Derlin; Frank M Bengel; Tobias L Ross; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Katja Derlin; Markus A Kuczyk; Christoph A J von Klot; Hans Christiansen; Christoph Henkenberens Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith Journal: Semin Nucl Med Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.446
Authors: Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Steffi Teichert; Johanna Zörgiebel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.488