Literature DB >> 28522740

Initial Experience with Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for Assessment of Whole-Body Tumor Burden as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Sebastian Schmuck1, Christoph A von Klot2, Christoph Henkenberens3, Jan M Sohns1, Hans Christiansen3, Hans-Jürgen Wester4, Tobias L Ross1, Frank M Bengel1, Thorsten Derlin5.   

Abstract

A quantitative imaging biomarker is desirable to provide a comprehensive measure of whole-body tumor burden in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and to standardize the evaluation of treatment-related changes. Therefore, we evaluated whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand PET/CT may be applied to provide PSMA-derived volumetric parameters for quantification of whole-body tumor burden.
Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT because of increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs. Volumetric parameters, that is, PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA), were calculated for each patient using a 3-dimensional segmentation and computerized volumetry technique and compared with serum PSA levels. In a group of 10 patients, volumetric parameters were applied for treatment monitoring.
Results: Volumetric parameters, that is, whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA, demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with PSA levels (P < 0.0001) as a surrogate marker of tumor burden, whereas SUVmax (P = 0.22) or SUVmean (P = 0.45) did not. Treatment response and treatment failure were paralleled by concordant changes in both whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body TL-PSMA (P = 0.02), whereas neither the change in SUVmax (P = 1.0) nor the change in SUVmean (P = 1.0) concordantly paralleled changes in PSA levels.
Conclusion: PSMA-derived volumetric parameters provide a quantitative imaging biomarker for whole-body tumor burden, capable of standardizing quantitative changes in PET imaging of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and of facilitating therapy monitoring.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MTV; PET/CT; PSMA; TLG; tumor volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28522740     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  44 in total

1.  PSA-stratified detection rates for [68Ga]THP-PSMA, a novel probe for rapid kit-based 68Ga-labeling and PET imaging, in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Johanna Zörgiebel; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; Katja Hueper; Christoph A von Klot; Christoph Henkenberens; Hans Christiansen; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System PSMA-RADS 1.0 on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Mehrbod S Javadi; Jeffrey P Leal; Takahiro Higuchi; Kenneth J Pienta; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Qiong Zou; Ju Jiao; Min-Hong Zou; Ming-Zhao Li; Ting Yang; Lei Xu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  [Kit-based radiolabeling of PSMA ligands].

Authors:  T Derlin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Schmidkonz; Michael Cordes; Daniela Schmidt; Tobias Bäuerle; Theresa Ida Goetz; Michael Beck; Olaf Prante; Alexander Cavallaro; Michael Uder; Bernd Wullich; Peter Goebell; Torsten Kuwert; Philipp Ritt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  qPSMA: Semiautomatic Software for Whole-Body Tumor Burden Assessment in Prostate Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT.

Authors:  Andrei Gafita; Marie Bieth; Markus Krönke; Giles Tetteh; Fernando Navarro; Hui Wang; Elisabeth Günther; Bjoern Menze; Wolfgang A Weber; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Comparison of 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT versus conventional cross-sectional imaging for target volume delineation for metastasis-directed radiotherapy for metachronous lymph node metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Walacides; Astrid Meier; Anne Caroline Knöchelmann; Daniele Meinecke; Thorsten Derlin; Frank M Bengel; Tobias L Ross; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Katja Derlin; Markus A Kuczyk; Christoph A J von Klot; Hans Christiansen; Christoph Henkenberens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on 68Ga-PSMA tracer uptake in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Ozan Cem Guler; Nese Torun; Mehmet Reyhan; Ali Fuat Yapar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  Imaging Characteristics and First Experience of [68Ga]THP-PSMA, a Novel Probe for Rapid Kit-Based Ga-68 Labeling and PET Imaging: Comparative Analysis with [68Ga]PSMA I&T.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Steffi Teichert; Johanna Zörgiebel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.