Literature DB >> 35212559

18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Divya Yadav1, Hyunsoo Hwang1, Wei Qiao1, Rituraj Upadhyay1, Brian F Chapin1, Chad Tang1, Ana Aparicio1, Maria A Lopez-Olivo1, Stella K Kang1, Homer A Macapinlac1, Tharakeswara K Bathala1, Devaki Shilpa Surasi1.   

Abstract

Purpose Fluorine 18 (18F)-fluciclovine and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers are commonly used for localizing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, but their accuracy in primary tumor detection in the initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer has not been established. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed of the electronic databases for original studies published between 2012 and 2020. Included studies were those in which 18F-fluciclovine or PSMA PET was used for initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance data were collected for primary tumor with histopathologic results as reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used for quality appraisal. A random-effects model was used to summarize the effect sizes and to evaluate the difference between two groups. Results Overall, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis (18F-fluciclovine = 4, PSMA = 13). Of these 17 studies, 12 (70%) were judged to have high risk of bias in one of the evaluated domains, and nine studies were deemed to have applicability concerns. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for 18F-fluciclovine versus PSMA were 85% (95% CI: 73%, 92%) versus 84% (95% CI: 77%, 89%) (P = .78), 77% (95% CI: 60%, 88%) versus 83% (95% CI: 76%, 89%) (P = .40), and 18.88 (95% CI: 5.01, 71.20) versus 29.37 (95% CI: 13.35, 64.60) (P = .57), respectively, with no significant difference in diagnostic test accuracy. Conclusion 18F-fluciclovine and PSMA PET demonstrated no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy in primary tumor detection during initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer. Keywords: PET, Prostate, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Staging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molecular Imaging–Cancer; PET; Prostate; Staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35212559      PMCID: PMC8965534          DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  50 in total

1.  68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men with Contraindications to or Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Alberto Saita; Massimo Lazzeri; Giovanni Lughezzani; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Rodolfo Hurle; Katia Marzo; Roberto Peschechera; Alessio Benetti; Silvia Zandegiacomo; Luisa Pasini; Giuliana Lista; Pasquale Cardone; Angelo Castello; Davide Maffei; Luca Balzarini; Arturo Chiti; Giorgio Guazzoni; Paolo Casale
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Clinical Nomograms for Preoperative T and N Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mark Thalgott; Charlotte Düwel; Isabel Rauscher; Matthias M Heck; Bernhard Haller; Andrei Gafita; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  18F-DCFBC Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted PET/CT Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer: Correlation With Multiparametric MRI and Histopathology.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Stephen Adler; Sandra Bednarova; Rose Berman; Anita T Ton; Yolanda McKinney; Philip Eclarinal; Craig Hill; George Afari; Sibaprasad Bhattacharyya; Ronnie C Mease; Maria J Merino; Paula M Jacobs; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Martin G Pomper; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.794

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Jonathan Kuten; Ibrahim Fahoum; Ziv Savin; Ofer Shamni; Gilad Gitstein; Dov Hershkovitz; Nicola J Mabjeesh; Ofer Yossepowitch; Eyal Mishani; Einat Even-Sapir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Detection of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison With mpMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Esther Mena; Stephanie A Harmon; Maria L Lindenberg; Stephen Adler; Anita T Ton; Joanna H Shih; Sherif Mehralivand; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnostic performance and safety of NMK36 (trans-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid)-PET/CT in primary prostate cancer: multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Yusuke Inoue; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Junji Yonese; Kazunari Tanabe; Satoshi Fukasawa; Tomio Inoue; Shiro Saito; Munehisa Ueno; Akiharu Otaka
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Incremental Value of Ga-68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  U N Pallavi; Sanjay Gogoi; Parul Thakral; Vindhya Malasani; Kanchan Sharma; Divya Manda; Subha Shankar Das; Vineet Pant; Ishita Sen
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-03-12

8.  A Prospective Comparison of 18F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE).

Authors:  Mikael Anttinen; Otto Ettala; Simona Malaspina; Ivan Jambor; Minna Sandell; Sami Kajander; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Jukka Schildt; Ekaterina Saukko; Pentti Rautio; Kirsi L Timonen; Tuomas Matikainen; Tommi Noponen; Jani Saunavaara; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Pekka Taimen; Jukka Kemppainen; Peter B Dean; Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Hannu J Aronen; Marko Seppänen; Peter J Boström
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13

9.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for local staging of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Soleen Ghafoor; Anton S Becker; Sangwon Han; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Irene A Burger; Heiko Schöder; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-09-09

10.  Utility of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI for Staging Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Prostate Cancer and Evaluating Response to Initial Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Andrew M McDonald; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Kristin K Porter; Gagandeep Choudhary; Constantine Burgan; Pradeep Bhambhvani; Jeffrey W Nix; Desiree E Morgan; Yufeng Li; John V Thomas; Jonathan McConathy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 6.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.