| Literature DB >> 32751318 |
Heidi M Nistelberger1, Rachel M Binks1, Stephen van Leeuwen1, David J Coates1, Shelley L McArthur1, Bronwyn M Macdonald1, Margaret Hankinson1, Margaret Byrne1.
Abstract
Phylogeographic studies can be used as a tool to understand the evolutionary history of a landscape, including the major drivers of species distributions and diversity. Extensive research has been conducted on phylogeographic patterns of species found in northern hemisphere landscapes that were affected by glaciations, yet the body of literature for older, unaffected landscapes is still underrepresented. The Pilbara region of north-western Australia is an ancient and vast landscape that is topographically complex, consisting of plateaus, gorges, valleys, and ranges, and experiences extreme meteorological phenomena including seasonal cyclonic activity. These features are expected to influence patterns of genetic structuring throughout the landscape either by promoting or restricting the movement of pollen and seed. Whilst a growing body of literature exists for the fauna endemic to this region, less is known about the forces shaping the evolution of plant taxa. In this study we investigate the phylogeography of two iconic Pilbara tree species, the Hamersley Bloodwood (Corymbia hamersleyana) and Western Gidgee (Acacia pruinocarpa), by assessing patterns of variation and structure in several chloroplast DNA regions and nuclear microsatellite loci developed for each species. Gene flow was found to be extensive in both taxa and there was evidence of long-distance seed dispersal across the region (pollen to seed ratios of 6.67 and 2.96 for C. hamersleyana and A. pruinocarpa, respectively), which may result from flooding and strong wind gusts associated with extreme cyclonic activity. Both species possessed high levels of cpDNA genetic diversity in comparison to those from formerly glaciated landscapes (C. hamersleyana = 14 haplotypes, A. pruinocarpa = 37 haplotypes) and showed evidence of deep lineage diversification occurring from the late Miocene, a time of intensifying aridity in this landscape that appears to be a critical driver of evolution in Pilbara taxa. In contrast to another study, we did not find evidence for topographic features acting as refugia for the widely sampled C. hamersleyana.Entities:
Keywords: Acacia; Corymbia; dispersal; genetic diversity; phylogeography; seed dispersal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32751318 PMCID: PMC7465080 DOI: 10.3390/genes11080863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1(A) C. hamersleyana at East Munjina (EMU); photo credit S. van Leeuwen. (B) Network of cpDNA haplotypes identified with frequency indicated by circle size and black dashes representing mutational steps. (C) Map of the 20 C. hamersleyana populations with pie charts indicating frequency of haplotypes at each population.
Figure 2(A) A. pruinocarpa at Warrawanda (WAR); photo credit S. van Leeuwen. (B) Network of cpDNA haplotypes identified with frequency indicated by circle size and black dashes representing mutational steps. (C) Map of the 23 A. pruinocarpa populations with pie charts indicating frequency of haplotypes at each population.
Genetic diversity parameters for 20 populations of C. hamersleyana and 23 populations of A. pruinocarpa across the Pilbara region of north-western Australia. All parameters (except the total number of private alleles) are averaged across 14 nuclear microsatellite loci for each population. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Presence on either Chichester or Hamersley Range is indicated.
| Pop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| BEN | 24 | 85.71 | 5.57 (0.88) | 1 | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.58 (0.08) | 0.18 * | |
| COP | 24 | 100 | 6.11 (1.04) | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.58 (0.08) | 0.19 * | ||
| DAW | 24 | 100 | 6.63 (1.14) | 0.49 (0.07) | 0.60 (0.08) | 0.18 * | Chichester | |
| DEE | 24 | 100 | 6.52 (0.94) | 1 | 0.52 (0.06) | 0.63 (0.06) | 0.17 * | |
| DIN | 24 | 100 | 7.29 (1.04) | 3 | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.64 (0.06) | 0.26 * | Hamersley |
| EMU | 24 | 100 | 6.97 (1.04) | 2 | 0.51 (0.08) | 0.61 (0.08) | 0.15 * | Hamersley |
| GAL | 24 | 100 | 7.33 (1.24) | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.60 (0.09) | 0.29 * | ||
| GID | 24 | 100 | 7.65 (1.25) | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.62 (0.08) | 0.23 * | Hamersley | |
| HAM | 24 | 100 | 7.06 (1.26) | 0.52 (0.07) | 0.61 (0.08) | 0.14 * | Hamersley | |
| HOO | 24 | 100 | 6.61 (1.11) | 0.49 (0.08) | 0.57 (0.08) | 0.14 * | Chichester | |
| KAN | 24 | 100 | 6.84 (1.02) | 0.46 (0.07) | 0.59 (0.07) | 0.21 * | ||
| KAR | 24 | 100 | 7.00 (1.17) | 2 | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.60 (0.08) | 0.21 * | |
| MCK | 24 | 100 | 6.22 (1.10) | 3 | 0.49 (0.07) | 0.58 (0.07) | 0.15 * | Chichester |
| MIN | 24 | 100 | 6.54 (0.84) | 2 | 0.49 (0.08) | 0.59 (0.07) | 0.17 * | |
| NUL | 24 | 100 | 6.21 (0.91) | 1 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.62 (0.08) | 0.25 * | |
| ORD | 24 | 92.86 | 6.68 (1.08) | 0.50 (0.07) | 0.62 (0.08) | 0.19 * | ||
| PAM | 24 | 92.86 | 7.08 (1.16) | 1 | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.59 (0.09) | 0.20 * | Hamersley |
| RUB | 24 | 92.86 | 6.40 (1.15) | 3 | 0.52 (0.08) | 0.59 (0.08) | 0.12 * | |
| SHA | 24 | 100 | 6.30 (0.98) | 1 | 0.51 (0.06) | 0.64 (0.07) | 0.19 * | |
| WEE | 24 | 100 | 6.44 (1.05) | 1 | 0.45 (0.08) | 0.60 (0.08) | 0.24 * | Hamersley |
| Mean (SE) | 24.00 (0) | 98.21 (0.88) | 6.67 (0.11) | 1.88 (0.27) | 0.48 (0.01) | 0.60 (0.01) | 0.19 (0.01) | |
|
| ||||||||
| ANG | 20 | 92.86 | 4.69 (0.71) | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.52 (0.07) | 0.20 * | Hamersley | |
| BUN | 24 | 100 | 4.55 (0.70) | 0.48 (0.05) | 0.58 (0.06) | 0.18 * | ||
| COO | 23 | 92.86 | 4.68 (0.71) | 1 | 0.41 (0.06) | 0.57 (0.07) | 0.29 * | |
| COR | 24 | 85.71 | 4.01 (0.66) | 2 | 0.46 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.07) | 0.08 * | Chichester |
| HAM | 24 | 92.86 | 4.33 (0.78) | 1 | 0.54 (0.07) | 0.55 (0.07) | 0.02 | Hamersley |
| HAR | 24 | 100 | 4.41 (0.73) | 1 | 0.45 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.07) | 0.11 * | Hamersley |
| HES | 23 | 92.86 | 4.86 (0.85) | 1 | 0.41 (0.06) | 0.51 (0.07) | 0.20 * | Chichester |
| HIL | 24 | 92.86 | 5.05 (0.91) | 1 | 0.45 (0.06) | 0.54 (0.07) | 0.18 * | Hamersley |
| HRP | 24 | 85.71 | 4.57 (0.95) | 0.40 (0.08) | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.15 * | Chichester | |
| MSJ | 23 | 92.86 | 4.49 (0.80) | 1 | 0.45 (0.07) | 0.54 (0.07) | 0.18 * | |
| MET | 22 | 92.86 | 4.90 (0.94) | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.56 (0.08) | 0.16 * | Hamersley | |
| NAM | 24 | 92.86 | 4.45 (0.78) | 1 | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.08) | 0.17 * | Hamersley |
| OPH | 23 | 100 | 4.66 (0.64) | 3 | 0.41 (0.07) | 0.53 (0.07) | 0.24 * | Hamersley |
| OXE | 23 | 100 | 4.67 (0.77) | 0.43 (0.06) | 0.54 (0.07) | 0.20 * | Hamersley | |
| RHL | 20 | 92.86 | 4.06 (0.63) | 0.41 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.08) | 0.18 * | Chichester | |
| RHO | 23 | 92.86 | 3.87 (0.56) | 0.39 (0.07) | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.14 * | Hamersley | |
| RIO | 23 | 92.86 | 4.25 (0.78) | 1 | 0.43 (0.07) | 0.51 (0.07) | 0.17 * | Hamersley |
| SPE | 23 | 92.86 | 4.58 (0.90) | 1 | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.51 (0.07) | 0.17 * | Hamersley |
| STE | 24 | 100 | 4.18 (0.69) | 0.35 (0.07) | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.25 * | ||
| WAR | 24 | 100 | 4.56 (0.66) | 1 | 0.46 (0.07) | 0.55 (0.07) | 0.15 * | Hamersley |
| WRA | 24 | 92.86 | 4.80 (0.84) | 1 | 0.44 (0.08) | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.05 * | Hamersley |
| YAM | 24 | 85.71 | 4.58 (0.83) | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.49 (0.08) | 0.14 * | Hamersley | |
| YAR | 24 | 100 | 4.59 (0.76) | 0.42 (0.06) | 0.53 (0.07) | 0.21 * | Hamersley | |
| Mean (SE) | 23.22(0.24) | 94.10 (0.97) | 4.51 (0.06) | 1.23 (0.17) | 0.43 (0.01) | 0.52 (0.01) | 0.17 (0.01) | |
n: Number of individuals; p: Percent polymorphic loci; NA: Allelic richness; NAP: Total number of private alleles; HO: Observed heterozygosity; HE: Expected heterozygosity; FIS: Fixation index. * Highly significant p < 0.005.
Figure 3Heatmaps displaying pairwise population FST values (see legend) based on nuclear microsatellite data for (A) C. hamersleyana and (B) A. pruinocarpa.
Figure 4STRUCTURE analysis based on nuclear microsatellite data for (A) C. hamersleyana (K = 2) and (B) A. pruinocarpa (K = 3). Samples are ordered by population and each vertical bar represents an individual, with colours representing the proportion of assignment to each of the K genetic clusters.
Chloroplast DNA diversity statistics, tests for neutrality, and demographic and spatial expansions based on three sequenced regions (rpl16 intron, ndhC-trnV, trnG intron) from 20 populations of C. hamersleyana, and four sequenced regions (ndhF-rpl32, rpl32-trnL, trnS-trnG, psbD-trnT) from 23 populations of A. pruinocarpa.
| Species |
|
| π | Tajima’s D | Fu’s |
| Demographic Expansion | Spatial Expansion | Pollen/Seed Flow Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14 | 0.759 | 0.003 (0.00) | 0.607 ns | 2.474 ns | 0.086 * | SSD ( | SSD ( | 6.67 (6.45–6.89) |
|
| 37 | 0.903 | 0.002 (0.00) | −0.844 ns | −4.982 ns | 0.082 * | SSD ( | SSD ( | 2.96 (2.69–3.23 |
Number of haplotypes (h), haplotype diversity (hd), nucleotide diversity (π). Estimates of pollen to seed flow ratios (95% confidence intervals in parentheses) (Ennos, 1994). * Highly significant p < 0.005.
Figure 5Phylogenetic tree of C. hamersleyana constructed from three cpDNA regions. Bold numbers above nodes indicate age in millions of years, numbers below lines are posterior probabilities of well supported internal nodes. Double slash lines indicate truncation of branch lengths for ease of visualisation. Note the tree shown for C. hamersleyana was dated based on the mean stem age of the Corymbia (Angophora) clade [65]. Grey boxes represent 95% confidence intervals (HPD). Scale bar represents time (Ma).
Figure 6Phylogenetic tree of A. pruinocarpa constructed from four cpDNA regions. Numbers above nodes indicate age in millions of years, numbers below lines are posterior probabilities of well supported internal nodes. Double slash lines indicate truncation of branch lengths for ease of visualisation. Note the tree was dated based on the cpDNA substitution rate identified for the Mimosoid clade in [70]. Grey boxes represent 95% confidence intervals (HPD). Scale bar represents time (Ma).