Susan Harrison1, Reed Noss2. 1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA spharrison@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Centres of endemism have received much attention from evolutionists, biogeographers, ecologists and conservationists. Climatic stability is often cited as a major reason for the occurrences of these geographic concentrations of species which are not found anywhere else. The proposed linkage between endemism and climatic stability raises unanswered questions about the persistence of biodiversity during the present era of rapidly changing climate. KEY QUESTIONS: The current status of evidence linking geographic centres of endemism to climatic stability over evolutionary time was examined. The following questions were asked. Do macroecological analyses support such an endemism-stability linkage? Do comparative studies find that endemic species display traits reflecting evolution in stable climates? Will centres of endemism in microrefugia or macrorefugia remain relatively stable and capable of supporting high biological diversity into the future? What are the implications of the endemism-stability linkage for conservation? CONCLUSIONS: Recent work using the concept of climate change velocity supports the classic idea that centres of endemism occur where past climatic fluctuations have been mild and where mountainous topography or favourable ocean currents contribute to creating refugia. Our knowledge of trait differences between narrow endemics and more widely distributed species remains highly incomplete. Current knowledge suggests that centres of endemism will remain relatively climatically buffered in the future, with the important caveat that absolute levels of climatic change and species losses in these regions may still be large.
BACKGROUND: Centres of endemism have received much attention from evolutionists, biogeographers, ecologists and conservationists. Climatic stability is often cited as a major reason for the occurrences of these geographic concentrations of species which are not found anywhere else. The proposed linkage between endemism and climatic stability raises unanswered questions about the persistence of biodiversity during the present era of rapidly changing climate. KEY QUESTIONS: The current status of evidence linking geographic centres of endemism to climatic stability over evolutionary time was examined. The following questions were asked. Do macroecological analyses support such an endemism-stability linkage? Do comparative studies find that endemic species display traits reflecting evolution in stable climates? Will centres of endemism in microrefugia or macrorefugia remain relatively stable and capable of supporting high biological diversity into the future? What are the implications of the endemism-stability linkage for conservation? CONCLUSIONS: Recent work using the concept of climate change velocity supports the classic idea that centres of endemism occur where past climatic fluctuations have been mild and where mountainous topography or favourable ocean currents contribute to creating refugia. Our knowledge of trait differences between narrow endemics and more widely distributed species remains highly incomplete. Current knowledge suggests that centres of endemism will remain relatively climatically buffered in the future, with the important caveat that absolute levels of climatic change and species losses in these regions may still be large.
Authors: Scott R Loarie; Philip B Duffy; Healy Hamilton; Gregory P Asner; Christopher B Field; David D Ackerly Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lee Hannah; Lorraine Flint; Alexandra D Syphard; Max A Moritz; Lauren B Buckley; Ian M McCullough Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Helena Augusta Viana E Souza; Rosane Garcia Collevatti; Matheus S Lima-Ribeiro; José Pires de Lemos-Filho; Maria Bernadete Lovato Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Scott R Loarie; Benjamin E Carter; Katharine Hayhoe; Sean McMahon; Richard Moe; Charles A Knight; David D Ackerly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthew M Kling; Brent D Mishler; Andrew H Thornhill; Bruce G Baldwin; David D Ackerly Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Gunnar Keppel; Gianluigi Ottaviani; Susan Harrison; Grant W Wardell-Johnson; Matteo Marcantonio; Ladislav Mucina Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Thomas Ibanez; E Blanchard; V Hequet; G Keppel; M Laidlaw; R Pouteau; H Vandrot; P Birnbaum Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: James S Borrell; Ghudaina Al Issaey; Darach A Lupton; Thomas Starnes; Abdulrahman Al Hinai; Saif Al Hatmi; Rebecca A Senior; Tim Wilkinson; Jo L H Milborrow; Andrew Stokes-Rees; Annette Patzelt Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Maria Panitsa; Ioannis P Kokkoris; Konstantinos Kougioumoutzis; Anna Kontopanou; Ioannis Bazos; Arne Strid; Panayotis Dimopoulos Journal: Plants (Basel) Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Andrew M Rankin; Frank E Anderson; Stephanie A Clutts; Anahí Espíndola; Bryan C Carstens; Michael Lucid; Jack Sullivan Journal: Biol J Linn Soc Lond Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 2.277
Authors: Andrew H Thornhill; Bruce G Baldwin; William A Freyman; Sonia Nosratinia; Matthew M Kling; Naia Morueta-Holme; Thomas P Madsen; David D Ackerly; Brent D Mishler Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 7.431