Literature DB >> 32750185

Comparison of Vertebral and Femoral Strength Between White and Asian Adults Using Finite Element Analysis of Computed Tomography Scans.

Namki Hong1, David C Lee2, Sundeep Khosla3, Tony M Keaveny4, Yumie Rhee1.   

Abstract

Given non-optimal testing rates for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the high use of computed tomography (CT) in some Asian countries, biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT)-based bone strength testing, which utilizes previously taken clinical CT scans, may improve osteoporosis testing rates. However, an understanding of ethnic differences in such bone strength measurements between Whites and Asians is lacking, which is an obstacle to clinical interpretation. Using previously taken CT and DXA scans, we analyzed bone strength and bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and spine in two sex- and age-matched community-based cohorts, aged 40 to 80 years: Whites (Rochester, MN, USA) and Koreans (Seoul, South Korea). For both the spine and femur, the age dependence of bone strength was similar for both groups, White (n = 371; women n = 202, 54.5%) and Korean (n = 396; women n = 199, 50.3%). For both sexes, mean spine strength did not differ between groups, but femur strength was 9% to 14% higher in Whites (p ≤ 0.001), an effect that became non-significant after weight adjustment (p = 0.375). For Koreans of both sexes, the fragile bone strength thresholds for classifying osteoporosis, when derived from regional DXA BMD T-score references, equaled the clinically validated thresholds for Whites (in women and men, femoral strength, 3000 N and 3500 N; vertebral strength 4500 N and 6500 N, respectively). Using these thresholds, classifications for osteoporosis for Koreans based on bone strength versus based on DXA BMD T-scores were consistent (89.1% to 94.4% agreement) at both the hip and spine and for both sexes. The BCT-based, clinically validated bone strength thresholds for Whites also applied to Koreans, which may facilitate clinical interpretation of CT-based bone strength measurements for Koreans.
© 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; ETHNICITY; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS; SCREENING

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750185      PMCID: PMC9260814          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.390


  46 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

3.  Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children.

Authors:  V Gilsanz; D L Skaggs; A Kovanlikaya; J Sayre; M L Loro; F Kaufman; S G Korenman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in bone mineral density among older women.

Authors:  Hae-Sung Nam; Sun-Seog Kweon; Jin-Su Choi; Joseph M Zmuda; P C Leung; Li-Yung Lui; Deanna D Hill; Alan L Patrick; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS).

Authors:  Annette L Adams; Heidi Fischer; David L Kopperdahl; David C Lee; Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Shireen Fatemi; Sundeep Khosla; Eric S Orwoll; Ethel S Siris; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  G Ballane; J A Cauley; M M Luckey; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Greater Gains in Spine and Hip Strength for Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Daria B Crittenden; Michael A Bolognese; Harry K Genant; Klaus Engelke; Beatriz Oliveri; Jacques P Brown; Bente L Langdahl; Chris Yan; Andreas Grauer; Cesar Libanati
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin; David L Kopperdhal; L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; Terry M Therneau; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength.

Authors:  Philippe K Zysset; Enrico Dall'ara; Peter Varga; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-08-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.