Literature DB >> 28543940

Greater Gains in Spine and Hip Strength for Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass.

Tony M Keaveny1, Daria B Crittenden2, Michael A Bolognese3, Harry K Genant4, Klaus Engelke5, Beatriz Oliveri6, Jacques P Brown7, Bente L Langdahl8, Chris Yan9, Andreas Grauer2, Cesar Libanati10.   

Abstract

Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits sclerostin and has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures within 12 months. In a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with low bone mass, romosozumab increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and spine by the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In a substudy of that trial, which included placebo and teriparatide arms, here we investigated whether those observed increases in BMD also resulted in improvements in estimated strength, as assessed by finite element analysis. Participants received blinded romosozumab s.c. (210 mg monthly) or placebo, or open-label teriparatide (20 μg daily) for 12 months. CT scans, obtained at the lumbar spine (n = 82) and proximal femur (n = 46) at baseline and month 12, were analyzed with finite element software (VirtuOst, O.N. Diagnostics) to estimate strength for a simulated compression overload for the spine (L1 vertebral body) and a sideways fall for the proximal femur, all blinded to treatment assignment. We found that, at month 12, vertebral strength increased more for romosozumab compared with both teriparatide (27.3% versus 18.5%; p = 0.005) and placebo (27.3% versus -3.9%; p < 0.0001); changes in femoral strength for romosozumab showed similar but smaller changes, increasing more with romosozumab versus teriparatide (3.6% versus -0.7%; p = 0.027), and trending higher versus placebo (3.6% versus -0.1%; p = 0.059). Compartmental analysis revealed that the bone-strengthening effects for romosozumab were associated with positive contributions from both the cortical and trabecular bone compartments at both the lumbar spine and hip. Taken together, these findings suggest that romosozumab may offer patients with osteoporosis a new bone-forming therapeutic option that increases both vertebral and femoral strength within 12 months.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANABOLICS; OSTEOPOROSIS; ROMOSOZUMAB; TERIPARATIDE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543940     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  28 in total

Review 1.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Sclerostin: an Emerging Target for the Treatment of Cancer-Induced Bone Disease.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Jesus Delgado-Calle
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Combination denosumab and high dose teriparatide for postmenopausal osteoporosis (DATA-HD): a randomised, controlled phase 4 trial.

Authors:  Joy N Tsai; Hang Lee; Natalie L David; Richard Eastell; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 32.069

Review 6.  The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 7.  Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eben G Estell; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  Teriparatide treatment exerts differential effects on the central and peripheral skeleton: results from the MOAT study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; L Yang; D Blackwell; J S Walsh; E McCloskey; N Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Wnt signaling in cardiovascular disease: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Austin Gay; Dwight A Towler
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 10.  MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Novel anabolic treatments for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.