| Literature DB >> 32747902 |
Monica Mihaela Iacov-Crăiţoiu1, Mihai Crăiţoiu.
Abstract
The presence of foreign materials in the tissues, represented in the present study by the insertion of dental implants, creates artificial structures that can sometimes cause adverse consequences, which implies the obligation to perform a complex medical assessment before inserting dental implants. This assessment appreciates the quality of the tissue, depending on which the use of a certain type of biomaterial is indicated and focuses on a certain surgical technique. We assessed the clinical, histopathological (HP) and immunohistochemical (IHC) aspects of peri-implant soft tissue in patients who did not show mobility or imagistic signs of bone resorption, three months after implant insertion, some of them showing no inflammatory clinical signs. Immunohistochemically, on the sections of the peri-implant mucosa, we assessed the presence of mast cells, vascularization and the process of angiogenesis. Mast cells are key cells actively involved in the pathogenesis of peri-implant inflammation, having an immunomodulatory role. Vasodilation and angiogenesis, determined by the release of chemical mediators by degranulation of mast cells under the action of pathogens, induce tissue remodeling, ensuring the healing and formation of a tissue to form a barrier that effectively prevents the development of a bacterial biofilm. Thus, the control of the activity of these cells is important for the management of the local inflammatory process. The correlations between the clinical, HP and IHC behavior of the peri-implant soft tissue bring important information for the clinic, emphasizing the need to identify a therapeutic strategy to modulate mast cell activity, in order to prevent and treat peri-implant disease, to ensure osseointegration and longer survival of the dental implant.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32747902 PMCID: PMC7728131 DOI: 10.47162/RJME.61.1.13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rom J Morphol Embryol ISSN: 1220-0522 Impact factor: 1.033
Figure 1Peri-implant mucosa: (A) Orthokeratinized epithelium; (B) Parakeratinized epithelium; (C) Acanthosis, deep epithelial ridges, edema of the epithelial cells in the intermediate layer, which, at the level of the superficial layer, have a vacuolar appearance; (D) Edema of cells in all layers of the epithelium; (E) Lamina propria rich in collagen fibers associated with numerous fibroblasts; (F) Diffuse lymphoplasmocytic inflammatory infiltrate; (G) Nodular-looking lymphoplasmocytic inflammatory infiltrate; (H) Numerous capillaries and inflammatory infiltrate in a papilla of the connective tissue. HE staining: (A–C, E and H) ×200; (G) ×100. Masson’s trichrome staining: (D and F) ×100
Figure 2Peri-implant mucosa: (A) Mast cells located intraepithelially and in the superficial chorion; (B) Mast cells arranged in the superficial chorion; (C) Diffused arranged granulated mast cells; (D) Mast cells with perivascular location. Positive immunolabeling for anti-tryptase antibody: (A–D) ×100
Figure 3Peri-implant mucosa: (A and B) Intense vascularization in the connective tissue’s papillae and superficial chorion; (C) Intense vascularization in areas with inflammatory infiltrates; (D) Capillary angiogenesis in inflammatory infiltrate. Positive immunolabeling for anti-CD34 antibody: (A and C) ×100; (B and D) ×200