Literature DB >> 22607161

Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review.

J R Strub1, B A Jurdzik, T Tuna.   

Abstract

Immediate loading of oral implants has become popular because of the increasing demands of a shortened treatment time. This literature review evaluates the prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations with immediate or delayed implant placement. Special attention was given to the impact of type of jaw, bone quality, implant length, time of implant placement and type of restoration. An electronic (PubMed) and a manual search in relevant journals were conducted until February 2012. Only publications in English, in peer-reviewed journals, were considered. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria: five studies dealt with fixed restorations, two studies with removable rehabilitation of edentulous jaws and two studies dealt with partially edentulous patients. Implant survival rates ranged from 95·8% to 100%, implant success rates in the treatment for the mandible from 79% to 100% and restoration survival rates for both jaws from 96·4% to 100%. Within the limits of this review, appropriate patient selection, primary implant stability, splinting of implants and the expertise of surgeons seem to be important for the prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations. Good bone quality and use of long implants appear to play a role. However, careful interpretation is required because conclusions are based on articles with low level of evidence. While immediate loading of oral implants in the mandible shows encouraging and predictable results, further multicenter randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power are needed to examine (i) the outcome of immediately loaded implants in the maxilla and (ii) the outcome of immediate loading of immediately placed implants.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22607161     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02315.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  11 in total

1.  A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Federico Herrero-Climent; Carmen María Díaz-Castro; Jose Nart; Ana Fernández-Palacín; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages.

Authors:  Fellippo Ramos Verri; Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior; Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida; Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri; Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista; Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-08-13

Review 3.  Advances in surfaces and osseointegration in implantology. Biomimetic surfaces.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Marc Fernandez-Yague; Pedro Lázaro; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Jose-Vicente Rios-Santos; Pedro Bullon; Francisco-Javier Gil
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-05-01

4.  Comparative stress analysis of delayed and immediate loading of a single implant in an edentulous maxilla model.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Daisuke Esaki; Tatsuya Matsuzaki; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14

5.  The influence of immediately loaded implant treatment in the atrophic edentulous maxilla on oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients: 3-year results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Maria Erkapers; Susanna Segerström; Karl Ekstrand; Russell A Baer; Joseph A Toljanic; Andreas Thor
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Comparative Study Between an Immediate Loading Protocol Using the Digital Workflow and a Conventional Protocol for Dental Implant Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Piyanut Rattanapanich; Weerapan Aunmeungtong; Pisaisit Chaijareenont; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Tooth Extraction Using Different Bone Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arturas Stumbras; Povilas Kuliesius; Gintaras Januzis; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-03-31

8.  Systemic Trans- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients Undergoing Dental Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Amália Moreno; Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro Villa; Stefan Fiuza de Carvalho Dekon; Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Risks of angled implant placement on posterior mandible buccal/lingual plated perforation: A virtual immediate implant placement study using CBCT.

Authors:  Tian-You Wang; Po-Jan Kuo; Earl Fu; Hsin-Yu Kuo; Nancy Nie-Shiuh Chang; Min-Wen Fu; E-Chin Shen; Hsien-Chung Chiu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.080

10.  Under-Drilling versus Hybrid Osseodensification Technique: Differences in Implant Primary Stability and Bone Density of the Implant Bed Walls.

Authors:  Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Joshua Gold; Tanya Somohano Marquez; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.