Literature DB >> 15142087

Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog.

L J Heitz-Mayfield1, B Schmid, C Weigel, S Gerber, D D Bosshardt, J Jönsson, N P Lang, J Jönsson.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of excessive occlusal load following placement of titanium implants in the presence of healthy peri-implant mucosal tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mandibular bilateral recipient sites in six Labrador dogs were established by extracting premolars and molars. After 3 months, two TPS (titanium plasma sprayed) implants and two SLA (sandblasted, large grit, acid etched) implants were placed on each side of the mandible in each dog. Three implants were lost in the initial healing phase, leaving 45 implants for evaluation. Following 6 months of healing, gold crowns were placed on implants on the test side of the mandible. The crowns were in supra-occlusal contact with the opposing teeth in order to create excessive occlusal load. Implants on the control side were not loaded. Plaque control was performed throughout the experimental period. Clinical measurements and standardised radiographs were obtained at baseline and 1, 3 and 8 months after loading. At 8 months, the dogs were killed and histologic analyses were performed.
RESULTS: At 8 months, all implants were osseointegrated. The mean probing depth was 2.5+/-0.3 and 2.6+/-0.3 mm at unloaded and loaded implants, respectively. Radiographically, the mean distance from the implant shoulder to the marginal bone level was 3.6+/-0.4 mm in the control group and 3.7+/-0.2 mm in the test group. Control and test groups were compared using paired non-parametric analyses. There were no statistically significant changes for any of the parameters from baseline to 8 months in the loaded and unloaded implants. Histologic evaluation showed a mean mineralised bone-to-implant contact of 73% in the control implants and 74% in the test implants, with no statistically significant difference between test and control implants.
CONCLUSION: In the presence of peri-implant mucosal health, a period of 8 months of excessive occlusal load on titanium implants did not result in loss of osseointegration or marginal bone loss when compared with non-loaded implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15142087     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis.

Authors:  Kivanc Akca; Murat Cavit Cehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Lateral static overload on immediately restored implants decreases the osteocyte index in peri-implant bone: a secondary analysis of a pre-clinical study in dogs.

Authors:  Celson Domingos de Calais; Dimorvan Bordin; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi; Alexandre Negretto; Jamil A Shibli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts.

Authors:  Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Cortino Sukotjo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Changes in the fractal dimension of peri-implant trabecular bone after loading: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Teh-Jing Mu; Dong-Won Lee; Kwang-Ho Park; Ik-Sang Moon
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Current Concepts on the Pathogenesis of Peri-implantitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Fragkioudakis; Georgia Tseleki; Aikaterini-Elisavet Doufexi; Dimitra Sakellari
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-03-19

6.  Clinical management of implant prostheses in patients with bruxism.

Authors:  Osamu Komiyama; Frank Lobbezoo; Antoon De Laat; Takashi Iida; Tsuyoshi Kitagawa; Hiroshi Murakami; Takao Kato; Misao Kawara
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-04

7.  Influence of occlusal loading on peri-implant clinical parameters. A pilot study.

Authors:  Hilario Pellicer-Chover; José Viña-Almunia; Javier Romero-Millán; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Berta García-Mira; María Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-05-01

8.  Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Helen Hye-In Kweon; Seong-Ho Choi; Young-Taek Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Fabrication of a screw-retained hybrid prosthesis following treatment of peri-implant defects: a case report.

Authors:  Bebek Serra Oguz Ahmet; Gulsum Sayin Ozel; Hilal Uslu Toygar
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

10.  The Failure Envelope Concept Applied To The Bone-Dental Implant System.

Authors:  R Korabi; K Shemtov-Yona; A Dorogoy; D Rittel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.