Literature DB >> 32743758

Effects of bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on brain glutamate levels and resting state connectivity: multimodal MRI data for the cathodal stimulation site.

Eva Mezger1, Frank Padberg1, Daniel Keeser2,3, Boris-Stephan Rauchmann1,4, Andre R Brunoni1,5, Lucia Bulubas1,6, Axel Thielscher7,8, Jana Werle1, Matin Mortazavi1, Temmuz Karali1, Sophia Stöcklein4, Birgit Ertl-Wagner9, Stephan Goerigk1,10.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions is currently proposed as therapeutic intervention for major depression and other psychiatric disorders. The in-depth mechanistic understanding of this bipolar and non-focal stimulation technique is still incomplete. In a pilot study, we investigated the effects of bifrontal stimulation on brain metabolite levels and resting state connectivity under the cathode using multiparametric MRI techniques and computational tDCS modeling. Within a double-blind cross-over design, 20 subjects (12 women, 23.7 ± 2 years) were randomized to active tDCS with standard bifrontal montage with the anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the cathode over the right DLPFC. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was acquired before, during, and after prefrontal tDCS to quantify glutamate (Glu), Glu + glutamine (Glx) and gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration in these areas. Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rsfcMRI) was acquired before and after the stimulation. The individual distribution of tDCS induced electric fields (efields) within the MRS voxel was computationally modelled using SimNIBS 2.0. There were no significant changes of Glu, Glx and GABA levels across conditions but marked differences in the course of Glu levels between female and male participants were observed. Further investigation yielded a significantly stronger Glu reduction after active compared to sham stimulation in female participants, but not in male participants. For rsfcMRI neither significant changes nor correlations with MRS data were observed. Exploratory analyses of the effect of efield intensity distribution on Glu changes showed distinct effects in different efield groups. Our findings are limited by the small sample size, but correspond to previously published results of cathodal tDCS. Future studies should address gender and efield intensity as moderators of tDCS induced effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical field modelling; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); GABA; Glutamate; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32743758      PMCID: PMC7867555          DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01177-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  44 in total

Review 1.  Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Walter Paulus; Susanne Will; Andre Antunes; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology.

Authors:  Hannah L Filmer; Shane E Ehrhardt; Thomas B Shaw; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Transcranial random noise stimulation for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ulrich Palm; Alkomiet Hasan; Daniel Keeser; Peter Falkai; Frank Padberg
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Anatoli Y Kabakov; Paul A Muller; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  U G Kalu; C E Sexton; C K Loo; K P Ebmeier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Ulrich Palm; Daniel Keeser; Alkomiet Hasan; Michael J Kupka; Janusch Blautzik; Nina Sarubin; Filipa Kaymakanova; Ina Unger; Peter Falkai; Thomas Meindl; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Frank Padberg
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Erin Yeagle; Axel Thielscher; Charles Schroeder; Ashesh D Mehta; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Glutamatergic System in Depression and Its Role in Neuromodulatory Techniques Optimization.

Authors:  Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth; Maria Anayali Estudillo-Guerra; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Azan Nyundo; Gina Chapa-Koloffon; Sami Ouanes
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Information Processing Speed, Working Memory, Attention, and Social Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Christina Grigorescu; Moussa A Chalah; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Tania Kümpfel; Frank Padberg; Samar S Ayache; Ulrich Palm
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Raquel Martín Riquel; Rafael Tomás Andújar Barroso; José Ramón Alameda Bailén; Jesús Carlos García Palomeque; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Individual predictors and electrophysiological signatures of working memory enhancement in aging.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Johnson; Hector Arciniega; Kevin T Jones; Alexandrea Kilgore-Gomez; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.