Literature DB >> 30978491

The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology.

Hannah L Filmer1, Shane E Ehrhardt2, Thomas B Shaw3, Jason B Mattingley4, Paul E Dux2.   

Abstract

Applying a weak electrical current to the cortex can have effects on a range of behaviours. Techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been widely used in both research and clinical settings. However, there is significant variability across individuals in terms of their responsiveness to stimulation, which poses practical challenges to the application of tDCS, but also provides a unique opportunity to study the link between the brain and behaviour. Here, we assessed the role of individual differences in cortical morphology - specifically in prefrontal cortical regions of interest - for determining the influence of tDCS on decision-making performance. Specifically, we employed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a previously replicated paradigm in which we modulated learning in a simple decision-making task by applying tDCS to the left prefrontal cortex in human subjects of both sexes. Cortical thickness of the left (but not right) prefrontal cortex accounted for almost 35% of the variance in stimulation efficacy across subjects. This is the first demonstration that variations in cortical architecture are associated with reliable differences in the effects of tDCS on cognition. Our findings have important implications for predicting the likely efficacy of different non-invasive brain stimulation treatments on a case by case basis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain stimulation; Cortical morphology; Individual differences; Prefrontal cortex; tDCS

Year:  2019        PMID: 30978491     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Johanna Bergmann; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kevin T Jones; Avery E Ostrand; Wan-Yu Hsu; Richard Campusano; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.184

3.  Effects of a Multi-Session Cognitive Training Combined With Brain Stimulation (TrainStim-Cog) on Age-Associated Cognitive Decline - Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Phase IIb (Monocenter) Trial.

Authors:  Daria Antonenko; Friederike Thams; Jessica Uhrich; Annika Dix; Franka Thurm; Shu-Chen Li; Ulrike Grittner; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Theory of Mind Performance Predicts tDCS-Mediated Effects on the Medial Prefrontal Cortex: A Pilot Study to Investigate the Role of Sex and Age.

Authors:  Maria Cotelli; Rosa Manenti; Elena Gobbi; Ivan Enrici; Danila Rusich; Clarissa Ferrari; Mauro Adenzato
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-28

Review 5.  Neural correlates of visual aesthetic appreciation: insights from non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cognitive training and brain stimulation in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD-Stim)-study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled phase IIb (monocenter) trial.

Authors:  Friederike Thams; Anna Kuzmina; Malte Backhaus; Shu-Chen Li; Ulrike Grittner; Daria Antonenko; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.982

7.  Prefrontal resting-state connectivity and antidepressant response: no associations in the ELECT-TDCS trial.

Authors:  Daniel Keeser; Lucia Bulubas; Frank Padberg; Eva Mezger; Paulo Suen; Priscila V Bueno; Fabio Duran; Geraldo Busatto; Edson Amaro; Isabela M Benseñor; Paulo A Lotufo; Stephan Goerigk; Wagner Gattaz; Andre R Brunoni
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Effects of bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on brain glutamate levels and resting state connectivity: multimodal MRI data for the cathodal stimulation site.

Authors:  Eva Mezger; Frank Padberg; Daniel Keeser; Boris-Stephan Rauchmann; Andre R Brunoni; Lucia Bulubas; Axel Thielscher; Jana Werle; Matin Mortazavi; Temmuz Karali; Sophia Stöcklein; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Stephan Goerigk
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Functional Effects of Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulation During Sequential Decision-Making: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study With Offline Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Iryna Schommartz; Annika Dix; Susanne Passow; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cortical Thickness in the Right Anterior Cingulate Cortex Relates to Clinical Response to Left Prefrontal Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Chris Baeken; Vince van Beek; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Romain Duprat; Debby Klooster
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.