Literature DB >> 22219028

Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus.

Anatoli Y Kabakov1, Paul A Muller, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Frances E Jensen, Alexander Rotenberg.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a method for modulating cortical excitability by weak constant electrical current that is applied through scalp electrodes. Although often described in terms of anodal or cathodal stimulation, depending on which scalp electrode pole is proximal to the cortical region of interest, it is the orientation of neuronal structures relative to the direct current (DC) vector that determines the effect of tDCS. To investigate the contribution of neural pathway orientation, we studied DCS-mediated neuromodulation in an in vitro rat hippocampal slice preparation. We examined the contribution of dendritic orientation to the direct current stimulation (DCS) neuromodulatory effect by recording field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in apical and basal dendrites of CA1 neurons within a constant DC field. In addition, we assessed the contribution of axonal orientation by recording CA1 and CA3 apical fEPSPs generated by stimulation of oppositely oriented Schaffer collateral and mossy fiber axons, respectively, during DCS. Finally, nonsynaptic excitatory signal propagation was measured along antidromically stimulated CA1 axons at different DCS amplitudes and polarity. We find that modulation of both the fEPSP and population spike depends on axonal orientation relative to the electric field vector. Axonal orientation determines whether the DC field is excitatory or inhibitory and dendritic orientation affects the magnitude, but not the overall direction, of the DC effect. These data suggest that tDCS may oppositely affect neurons in a stimulated cortical volume if these neurons are excited by oppositely orientated axons in a constant electrical field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22219028      PMCID: PMC3331663          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00715.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Rechdi Ahdab; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Felipe Fregni; Eman M Khedr; Michael Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Influence of variable nerve fibre geometry on the excitation and blocking threshold. A simulation study.

Authors:  A Vucković; J J Struijk; N J M Rijkhoff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Reducing procedural pain and discomfort associated with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  James L McFadden; Jeff J Borckardt; Mark S George; William Beam
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation decreases convulsions and spatial memory deficits following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in immature rats.

Authors:  Tohru Kamida; Shiqi Kong; Nobuoki Eshima; Tatsuya Abe; Minoru Fujiki; Hidenori Kobayashi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Acute and chronic increases in excitability in rat hippocampal slices after perinatal hypoxia In vivo.

Authors:  F E Jensen; C Wang; C E Stafstrom; Z Liu; C Geary; M C Stevens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Decreased glutamate receptor 2 expression and enhanced epileptogenesis in immature rat hippocampus after perinatal hypoxia-induced seizures.

Authors:  R M Sanchez; S Koh; C Rio; C Wang; E D Lamperti; D Sharma; G Corfas; F E Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pre-synaptic adenosine A2A receptors control cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission.

Authors:  Alberto Martire; Maria Teresa Tebano; Valentina Chiodi; Samira G Ferreira; Rodrigo A Cunha; Attila Köfalvi; Patrizia Popoli
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.372

9.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Naomi Kriener; Nicolas Lang; Klara Boros; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  Evoked responses of the dentate gyrus during seizures in developing gerbils with inherited epilepsy.

Authors:  Paul S Buckmaster; Emilia H Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  82 in total

1.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Batteries and the brain.

Authors:  Steve A Edgley; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Russell D Hamer; Balázs V Nagy; Mirella T S Barboni; Mirella Gualtieri; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Lasting modulation of in vitro oscillatory activity with weak direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neuromodulation of Axon Terminals.

Authors:  Darpan Chakraborty; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; Hanoch Kaphzan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.

Authors:  Bryan S Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Nicholas Nesbitt; Bin He
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.