Literature DB >> 32735746

Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game.

Jason J Ki1, Lucas C Parra1, Jacek P Dmochowski1.   

Abstract

While it is well known that vision guides movement, less appreciated is that the motor cortex also provides input to the visual system. Here, we asked whether neural processing of visual stimuli is acutely modulated during motor activity, hypothesizing that visual evoked responses are enhanced when engaged in a motor task that depends on the visual stimulus. To test this, we told participants that their brain activity was controlling a video game that was in fact the playback of a prerecorded game. The deception, which was effective in half of participants, aimed to engage the motor system while avoiding evoked responses related to actual movement or somatosensation. In other trials, subjects actively played the game with keyboard control or passively watched a playback. The strength of visually evoked responses was measured as the temporal correlation between the continuous stimulus and the evoked potentials on the scalp. We found reduced correlation during passive viewing, but no difference between active and sham play. Alpha-band (8-12 Hz) activity was reduced over central electrodes during sham play, indicating recruitment of motor cortex despite the absence of overt movement. To account for the potential increase of attention during gameplay, we conducted a second study with subjects counting screen items during viewing. We again found increased correlation during sham play, but no difference between counting and passive viewing. While we cannot fully rule out the involvement of attention, our findings do demonstrate an enhancement of visual evoked responses during active vision.
© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; decoding; naturalistic stimuli; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32735746      PMCID: PMC7818444          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.698


  38 in total

1.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions.

Authors:  A Wohlschläger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: evidence from parietal extinction.

Authors:  Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Robert Rafal; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized.

Authors:  Todd C Handy; Scott T Grafton; Neha M Shroff; Sarah Ketay; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A picture says more than a thousand words: behavioural and ERP evidence for attentional enhancements due to action affordances.

Authors:  Maha Adamo; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Fadiga; V Gallese; L Fogassi
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-03

Review 7.  Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations.

Authors:  S P Wise; D Boussaoud; P B Johnson; R Caminiti
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 8.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action.

Authors:  G Knoblich; R Flach
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

10.  Walking enhances peripheral visual processing in humans.

Authors:  Liyu Cao; Barbara Händel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neural responses to natural visual motion are spatially selective across the visual field, with selectivity differing across brain areas and task.

Authors:  Jason J Ki; Jacek P Dmochowski; Jonathan Touryan; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.698

2.  Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game.

Authors:  Jason J Ki; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.