Literature DB >> 12640459

Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized.

Todd C Handy1, Scott T Grafton, Neha M Shroff, Sarah Ketay, Michael S Gazzaniga.   

Abstract

Visually guided grasping movements require a rapid transformation of visual representations into object-specific motor programs. Here we report that graspable objects may facilitate these visuomotor transformations by automatically grabbing visual spatial attention. Human subjects viewed two task-irrelevant objects--one was a 'tool', the other a 'non-tool'--while waiting for a target to be presented in one of the two object locations. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we found that spatial attention was systematically drawn to tools in the right and lower visual fields, the hemifields that are dominant for visuomotor processing. Using event-related fMRI, we confirmed that tools grabbed spatial attention only when they also activated dorsal regions of premotor and prefrontal cortices, regions associated with visually guided actions and their planning. Although it is widely accepted that visual sensory gain aids perception, our results suggest that it may also have consequences for object-directed actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12640459     DOI: 10.1038/nn1031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  63 in total

1.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills.

Authors:  Scott H Johnson-Frey; Roger Newman-Norlund; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: four hurdles before research can sprint forward.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-31

3.  Perceptual and motor-based responses to hand actions on objects: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Eun Young Yoon; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortico-motoneuronal output to intrinsic hand muscles is differentially influenced by static changes in shoulder positions.

Authors:  F Dominici; T Popa; F Ginanneschi; R Mazzocchio; A Rossi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The time course of visuo-motor affordances.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Christoph D Dahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Analysis of intersubject variability in activation: an application to the incidental episodic retrieval during recognition test.

Authors:  Motoaki Sugiura; Karl J Friston; Klaus Willmes; Nadim J Shah; Karl Zilles; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A neural system for learning about object function.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Miranda van Turennout; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Action properties of object images facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Graspable Objects Grab Attention More Than Images Do.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.