Literature DB >> 32734279

Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change.

N Bellouin1, J Quaas2, E Gryspeerdt3, S Kinne4, P Stier5, D Watson-Parris5, O Boucher6, K S Carslaw7, M Christensen5, A-L Daniau8, J-L Dufresne9, G Feingold10, S Fiedler4,11, P Forster12, A Gettelman13, J M Haywood14,15, U Lohmann16, F Malavelle14, T Mauritsen17, D T McCoy7, G Myhre18, J Mülmenstädt2, D Neubauer16, A Possner19,20, M Rugenstein4, Y Sato21,22, M Schulz23, S E Schwartz24, O Sourdeval2,25, T Storelvmo26, V Toll1,27, D Winker28, B Stevens4.   

Abstract

Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable, and arguable lines of evidence, including modeling approaches, theoretical considerations, and observations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol-radiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol-driven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed-phase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of -1.6 to -0.6 W m-2, or -2.0 to -0.4 W m-2 with a 90% likelihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment but shifted toward more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial-era changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds. ©2019. The Authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32734279      PMCID: PMC7384191          DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Geophys        ISSN: 8755-1209            Impact factor:   22.000


  49 in total

1.  Aerosols and climate.

Authors:  P Chyacutelek; J A Coakley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect precipitation?

Authors:  Daniel Rosenfeld; Ulrike Lohmann; Graciela B Raga; Colin D O'Dowd; Markku Kulmala; Sandro Fuzzi; Anni Reissell; Meinrat O Andreae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Satellite methods underestimate indirect climate forcing by aerosols.

Authors:  Joyce E Penner; Li Xu; Minghuai Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Soot, sulfate, dust and the climate - three ways through the fog.

Authors:  Joyce E Penner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability.

Authors:  Steven Ghan; Minghuai Wang; Shipeng Zhang; Sylvaine Ferrachat; Andrew Gettelman; Jan Griesfeller; Zak Kipling; Ulrike Lohmann; Hugh Morrison; David Neubauer; Daniel G Partridge; Philip Stier; Toshihiko Takemura; Hailong Wang; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatial and seasonal trends in biogenic secondary organic aerosol tracers and water-soluble organic carbon in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Xiang Ding; Mei Zheng; Liping Yu; Xiaolu Zhang; Rodney J Weber; Bo Yan; Armistead G Russell; Eric S Edgerton; Xinming Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Aerosol effects on cloud water amounts were successfully simulated by a global cloud-system resolving model.

Authors:  Yousuke Sato; Daisuke Goto; Takuro Michibata; Kentaroh Suzuki; Toshihiko Takemura; Hirofumi Tomita; Teruyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations.

Authors:  Po-Lun Ma; Philip J Rasch; Hélène Chepfer; David M Winker; Steven J Ghan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Impact of aerosols on ice crystal size.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; Kuo-Nan Liou; Yu Gu; Jonathan H Jiang; Qinbin Li; Rong Fu; Lei Huang; Xiaohong Liu; Xiangjun Shi; Hui Su; Cenlin He
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.133

10.  Is Black Carbon an Unimportant Ice-Nucleating Particle in Mixed-Phase Clouds?

Authors:  Jesús Vergara-Temprado; Mark A Holden; Thomas R Orton; Daniel O'Sullivan; Nsikanabasi S Umo; Jo Browse; Carly Reddington; María Teresa Baeza-Romero; Jenny M Jones; Amanda Lea-Langton; Alan Williams; Ken S Carslaw; Benjamin J Murray
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.261

View more
  16 in total

1.  Direct radiative effects of airborne microplastics.

Authors:  Laura E Revell; Peter Kuma; Eric C Le Ru; Walter R C Somerville; Sally Gaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Anthropogenic Aerosols Modulated 20th-Century Sahel Rainfall Variability Via Their Impacts on North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature.

Authors:  Shipeng Zhang; Philip Stier; Guy Dagan; Minghuai Wang
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.576

Review 3.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Authors:  S C Sherwood; M J Webb; J D Annan; K C Armour; P M Forster; J C Hargreaves; G Hegerl; S A Klein; K D Marvel; E J Rohling; M Watanabe; T Andrews; P Braconnot; C S Bretherton; G L Foster; Z Hausfather; A S von der Heydt; R Knutti; T Mauritsen; J R Norris; C Proistosescu; M Rugenstein; G A Schmidt; K B Tokarska; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.946

4.  The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018.

Authors:  D S Lee; D W Fahey; A Skowron; M R Allen; U Burkhardt; Q Chen; S J Doherty; S Freeman; P M Forster; J Fuglestvedt; A Gettelman; R R De León; L L Lim; M T Lund; R J Millar; B Owen; J E Penner; G Pitari; M J Prather; R Sausen; L J Wilcox
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  The hemispheric contrast in cloud microphysical properties constrains aerosol forcing.

Authors:  Isabel L McCoy; Daniel T McCoy; Robert Wood; Leighton Regayre; Duncan Watson-Parris; Daniel P Grosvenor; Jane P Mulcahy; Yongxiang Hu; Frida A-M Bender; Paul R Field; Kenneth S Carslaw; Hamish Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An observation-based scaling model for climate sensitivity estimates and global projections to 2100.

Authors:  Raphaël Hébert; Shaun Lovejoy; Bruno Tremblay
Journal:  Clim Dyn       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing.

Authors:  Hunter Brown; Xiaohong Liu; Rudra Pokhrel; Shane Murphy; Zheng Lu; Rawad Saleh; Tero Mielonen; Harri Kokkola; Tommi Bergman; Gunnar Myhre; Ragnhild B Skeie; Duncan Watson-Paris; Philip Stier; Ben Johnson; Nicolas Bellouin; Michael Schulz; Ville Vakkari; Johan Paul Beukes; Pieter Gideon van Zyl; Shang Liu; Duli Chand
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  On the relationship between cloud water composition and cloud droplet number concentration.

Authors:  Alexander B MacDonald; Ali Hossein Mardi; Hossein Dadashazar; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Ewan Crosbie; Haflidi H Jonsson; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 6.133

9.  Condensation sink of atmospheric vapors: the effect of vapor properties and the resulting uncertainties.

Authors:  Santeri Tuovinen; Jenni Kontkanen; Runlong Cai; Markku Kulmala
Journal:  Environ Sci Atmos       Date:  2021-09-23

10.  Significant underestimation of radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions derived from satellite-based methods.

Authors:  Hailing Jia; Xiaoyan Ma; Fangqun Yu; Johannes Quaas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.