Literature DB >> 26921324

Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability.

Steven Ghan1, Minghuai Wang2, Shipeng Zhang3, Sylvaine Ferrachat4, Andrew Gettelman5, Jan Griesfeller6, Zak Kipling7, Ulrike Lohmann4, Hugh Morrison5, David Neubauer4, Daniel G Partridge8, Philip Stier7, Toshihiko Takemura9, Hailong Wang10, Kai Zhang10.   

Abstract

A large number of processes are involved in the chain from emissions of aerosol precursor gases and primary particles to impacts on cloud radiative forcing. Those processes are manifest in a number of relationships that can be expressed as factors dlnX/dlnY driving aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing. These factors include the relationships between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and emissions, droplet number and CCN concentration, cloud fraction and droplet number, cloud optical depth and droplet number, and cloud radiative forcing and cloud optical depth. The relationship between cloud optical depth and droplet number can be further decomposed into the sum of two terms involving the relationship of droplet effective radius and cloud liquid water path with droplet number. These relationships can be constrained using observations of recent spatial and temporal variability of these quantities. However, we are most interested in the radiative forcing since the preindustrial era. Because few relevant measurements are available from that era, relationships from recent variability have been assumed to be applicable to the preindustrial to present-day change. Our analysis of Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom) model simulations suggests that estimates of relationships from recent variability are poor constraints on relationships from anthropogenic change for some terms, with even the sign of some relationships differing in many regions. Proxies connecting recent spatial/temporal variability to anthropogenic change, or sustained measurements in regions where emissions have changed, are needed to constrain estimates of anthropogenic aerosol impacts on cloud radiative forcing.

Keywords:  aerosol radiative forcing; cloud−aerosol interactions; constraints; factors

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921324      PMCID: PMC4889346          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514036113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing.

Authors:  Andrew S Ackerman; Michael P Kirkpatrick; David E Stevens; Owen B Toon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness.

Authors:  B A Albrecht
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  State-dependent climate sensitivity in past warm climates and its implications for future climate projections.

Authors:  Rodrigo Caballero; Matthew Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing.

Authors:  K S Carslaw; L A Lee; C L Reddington; K J Pringle; A Rap; P M Forster; G W Mann; D V Spracklen; M T Woodhouse; L A Regayre; J R Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Satellite methods underestimate indirect climate forcing by aerosols.

Authors:  Joyce E Penner; Li Xu; Minghuai Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle.

Authors:  V Ramanathan; P J Crutzen; J T Kiehl; D Rosenfeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  New approaches to quantifying aerosol influence on the cloud radiative effect.

Authors:  Graham Feingold; Allison McComiskey; Takanobu Yamaguchi; Jill S Johnson; Kenneth S Carslaw; K Sebastian Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Weak average liquid-cloud-water response to anthropogenic aerosols.

Authors:  Velle Toll; Matthew Christensen; Johannes Quaas; Nicolas Bellouin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Weak sensitivity of cloud water to aerosols.

Authors:  Anna Possner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Studying Scale Dependency of Aerosol Cloud Interactions using Multi-Scale Cloud Formulations.

Authors:  Timothy Glotfelty; Kiran Alapaty; Jian He; Patrick Hawbecker; Xiaoliang Song; Guang Zhang
Journal:  Mon Weather Rev       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.735

5.  Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on cloud albedo.

Authors:  Edward Gryspeerdt; Johannes Quaas; Sylvaine Ferrachat; Andrew Gettelman; Steven Ghan; Ulrike Lohmann; Hugh Morrison; David Neubauer; Daniel G Partridge; Philip Stier; Toshihiko Takemura; Hailong Wang; Minghuai Wang; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Strong constraints on aerosol-cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions.

Authors:  Florent F Malavelle; Jim M Haywood; Andy Jones; Andrew Gettelman; Lieven Clarisse; Sophie Bauduin; Richard P Allan; Inger Helene H Karset; Jón Egill Kristjánsson; Lazaros Oreopoulos; Nayeong Cho; Dongmin Lee; Nicolas Bellouin; Olivier Boucher; Daniel P Grosvenor; Ken S Carslaw; Sandip Dhomse; Graham W Mann; Anja Schmidt; Hugh Coe; Margaret E Hartley; Mohit Dalvi; Adrian A Hill; Ben T Johnson; Colin E Johnson; Jeff R Knight; Fiona M O'Connor; Daniel G Partridge; Philip Stier; Gunnar Myhre; Steven Platnick; Graeme L Stephens; Hanii Takahashi; Thorvaldur Thordarson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system.

Authors:  John H Seinfeld; Christopher Bretherton; Kenneth S Carslaw; Hugh Coe; Paul J DeMott; Edward J Dunlea; Graham Feingold; Steven Ghan; Alex B Guenther; Ralph Kahn; Ian Kraucunas; Sonia M Kreidenweis; Mario J Molina; Athanasios Nenes; Joyce E Penner; Kimberly A Prather; V Ramanathan; Venkatachalam Ramaswamy; Philip J Rasch; A R Ravishankara; Daniel Rosenfeld; Graeme Stephens; Robert Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Aerosol indirect effects on the nighttime Arctic Ocean surface from thin, predominantly liquid clouds.

Authors:  Lauren M Zamora; Ralph A Kahn; Sabine Eckhardt; Allison McComiskey; Patricia Sawamura; Richard Moore; Andreas Stohl
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.133

Review 9.  Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change.

Authors:  N Bellouin; J Quaas; E Gryspeerdt; S Kinne; P Stier; D Watson-Parris; O Boucher; K S Carslaw; M Christensen; A-L Daniau; J-L Dufresne; G Feingold; S Fiedler; P Forster; A Gettelman; J M Haywood; U Lohmann; F Malavelle; T Mauritsen; D T McCoy; G Myhre; J Mülmenstädt; D Neubauer; A Possner; M Rugenstein; Y Sato; M Schulz; S E Schwartz; O Sourdeval; T Storelvmo; V Toll; D Winker; B Stevens
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 22.000

10.  Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives.

Authors:  Daniel P Grosvenor; Odran Sourdeval; Paquita Zuidema; Andrew Ackerman; Mikhail D Alexandrov; Ralf Bennartz; Reinout Boers; Brian Cairns; J Christine Chiu; Matthew Christensen; Hartwig Deneke; Michael Diamond; Graham Feingold; Ann Fridlind; Anja Hünerbein; Christine Knist; Pavlos Kollias; Alexander Marshak; Daniel McCoy; Daniel Merk; David Painemal; John Rausch; Daniel Rosenfeld; Herman Russchenberg; Patric Seifert; Kenneth Sinclair; Philip Stier; Bastiaan van Diedenhoven; Manfred Wendisch; Frank Werner; Robert Wood; Zhibo Zhang; Johannes Quaas
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 22.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.