Literature DB >> 32895604

The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018.

D S Lee1, D W Fahey2, A Skowron1, M R Allen3,4, U Burkhardt5, Q Chen6, S J Doherty7, S Freeman1, P M Forster8, J Fuglestvedt9, A Gettelman10, R R De León1, L L Lim1, M T Lund9, R J Millar3,11, B Owen1, J E Penner12, G Pitari13, M J Prather14, R Sausen5, L J Wilcox15.   

Abstract

Global aviation operations contribute to anthropogenic climate change via a complex set of processes that lead to a net surface warming. Of importance are aviation emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), water vapor, soot and sulfate aerosols, and increased cloudiness due to contrail formation. Aviation grew strongly over the past decades (1960-2018) in terms of activity, with revenue passenger kilometers increasing from 109 to 8269 billion km yr-1, and in terms of climate change impacts, with CO2 emissions increasing by a factor of 6.8 to 1034 Tg CO2 yr-1. Over the period 2013-2018, the growth rates in both terms show a marked increase. Here, we present a new comprehensive and quantitative approach for evaluating aviation climate forcing terms. Both radiative forcing (RF) and effective radiative forcing (ERF) terms and their sums are calculated for the years 2000-2018. Contrail cirrus, consisting of linear contrails and the cirrus cloudiness arising from them, yields the largest positive net (warming) ERF term followed by CO2 and NOx emissions. The formation and emission of sulfate aerosol yields a negative (cooling) term. The mean contrail cirrus ERF/RF ratio of 0.42 indicates that contrail cirrus is less effective in surface warming than other terms. For 2018 the net aviation ERF is +100.9 milliwatts (mW) m-2 (5-95% likelihood range of (55, 145)) with major contributions from contrail cirrus (57.4 mW m-2), CO2 (34.3 mW m-2), and NOx (17.5 mW m-2). Non-CO2 terms sum to yield a net positive (warming) ERF that accounts for more than half (66%) of the aviation net ERF in 2018. Using normalization to aviation fuel use, the contribution of global aviation in 2011 was calculated to be 3.5 (4.0, 3.4) % of the net anthropogenic ERF of 2290 (1130, 3330) mW m-2. Uncertainty distributions (5%, 95%) show that non-CO2 forcing terms contribute about 8 times more than CO2 to the uncertainty in the aviation net ERF in 2018. The best estimates of the ERFs from aviation aerosol-cloud interactions for soot and sulfate remain undetermined. CO2-warming-equivalent emissions based on global warming potentials (GWP* method) indicate that aviation emissions are currently warming the climate at approximately three times the rate of that associated with aviation CO2 emissions alone. CO2 and NOx aviation emissions and cloud effects remain a continued focus of anthropogenic climate change research and policy discussions.
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aviation; CO2; Climate; Contrail cirrus; NOx; Radiative forcing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32895604      PMCID: PMC7468346          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  20 in total

1.  The importance of the diurnal and annual cycle of air traffic for contrail radiative forcing.

Authors:  Nicola Stuber; Piers Forster; Gaby Rädel; Keith Shine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Climate forcing from the transport sectors.

Authors:  Jan Fuglestvedt; Terje Berntsen; Gunnar Myhre; Kristin Rypdal; Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors.

Authors:  Nadine Unger; Tami C Bond; James S Wang; Dorothy M Koch; Surabi Menon; Drew T Shindell; Susanne Bauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation.

Authors:  D S Lee; G Pitari; V Grewe; K Gierens; J E Penner; A Petzold; M J Prather; U Schumann; A Bais; T Berntsen; D Iachetti; L L Lim; R Sausen
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Uncertainties in climate assessment for the case of aviation NO.

Authors:  Christopher D Holmes; Qi Tang; Michael J Prather
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Trading off Aircraft Fuel Burn and NO x Emissions for Optimal Climate Policy.

Authors:  Sarah Freeman; David S Lee; Ling L Lim; Agnieszka Skowron; Ruben Rodriguez De León
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Aviation effects on already-existing cirrus clouds.

Authors:  Matthias Tesche; Peggy Achtert; Paul Glantz; Kevin J Noone
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Anthropogenic Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds.

Authors:  Joyce E Penner; Cheng Zhou; Anne Garnier; David L Mitchell
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.261

9.  Understanding Rapid Adjustments to Diverse Forcing Agents.

Authors:  C J Smith; R J Kramer; G Myhre; P M Forster; B J Soden; T Andrews; O Boucher; G Faluvegi; D Fläschner; Ø Hodnebrog; M Kasoar; V Kharin; A Kirkevåg; J-F Lamarque; J Mülmenstädt; D Olivié; T Richardson; B H Samset; D Shindell; P Stier; T Takemura; A Voulgarakis; D Watson-Parris
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.720

10.  Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants.

Authors:  Michelle Cain; John Lynch; Myles R Allen; Jan S Fuglestvedt; David J Frame; Adrian H Macey
Journal:  NPJ Clim Atmos Sci       Date:  2019-09-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  Greater fuel efficiency is potentially preferable to reducing NOx emissions for aviation's climate impacts.

Authors:  Agnieszka Skowron; David S Lee; Rubén Rodríguez De León; Ling L Lim; Bethan Owen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Toward net-zero sustainable aviation fuel with wet waste-derived volatile fatty acids.

Authors:  Nabila A Huq; Glenn R Hafenstine; Xiangchen Huo; Hannah Nguyen; Stephen M Tifft; Davis R Conklin; Daniela Stück; Jim Stunkel; Zhibin Yang; Joshua S Heyne; Matthew R Wiatrowski; Yimin Zhang; Ling Tao; Junqing Zhu; Charles S McEnally; Earl D Christensen; Cameron Hays; Kurt M Van Allsburg; Kinga A Unocic; Harry M Meyer; Zia Abdullah; Derek R Vardon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Unprecedented Impacts of Aviation Emissions on Global Environmental and Climate Change Scenario.

Authors:  Farooq Sher; David Raore; Jiří Jaromír Klemeš; Piyya Muhammad Rafi-Ul-Shan; Martin Khzouz; Kristina Marintseva; Omid Razmkhah
Journal:  Curr Pollut Rep       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  An Observational Constraint on Aviation-Induced Cirrus From the COVID-19-Induced Flight Disruption.

Authors:  Ruth A R Digby; Nathan P Gillett; Adam H Monahan; Jason N S Cole
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.720

5.  Opportunistic experiments to constrain aerosol effective radiative forcing.

Authors:  Matthew W Christensen; Andrew Gettelman; Jan Cermak; Guy Dagan; Michael Diamond; Alyson Douglas; Graham Feingold; Franziska Glassmeier; Tom Goren; Daniel P Grosvenor; Edward Gryspeerdt; Ralph Kahn; Zhanqing Li; Po-Lun Ma; Florent Malavelle; Isabel L McCoy; Daniel T McCoy; Greg McFarquhar; Johannes Mülmenstädt; Sandip Pal; Anna Possner; Adam Povey; Johannes Quaas; Daniel Rosenfeld; Anja Schmidt; Roland Schrödner; Armin Sorooshian; Philip Stier; Velle Toll; Duncan Watson-Parris; Robert Wood; Mingxi Yang; Tianle Yuan
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.133

6.  The impact of COVID-19 on air passenger demand and CO2 emissions in Brazil.

Authors:  João Pedro Bazzo Vieira; Carlos Kauê Vieira Braga; Rafael H M Pereira
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 6.142

Review 7.  Can virtual events achieve co-benefits for climate, participation, and satisfaction? Comparative evidence from five international Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy Week conferences.

Authors:  Joe Yates; Suneetha Kadiyala; Yuemeng Li; Sylvia Levy; Abel Endashaw; Hallie Perlick; Parke Wilde
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2022-02

8.  Give Up Flights? Psychological Predictors of Intentions and Policy Support to Reduce Air Travel.

Authors:  Jessica M Berneiser; Annalena C Becker; Laura S Loy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-04

9.  The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the US airline market: Are current business models equipped for upcoming changes in the air transport sector?

Authors:  Pol Fontanet-Pérez; Xosé H Vázquez; Diego Carou
Journal:  Case Stud Transp Policy       Date:  2022-02-04

10.  Impact of Rocket Launch and Space Debris Air Pollutant Emissions on Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate.

Authors:  Robert G Ryan; Eloise A Marais; Chloe J Balhatchet; Sebastian D Eastham
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.