Literature DB >> 33603281

An observation-based scaling model for climate sensitivity estimates and global projections to 2100.

Raphaël Hébert1, Shaun Lovejoy2, Bruno Tremblay3.   

Abstract

We directly exploit the stochasticity of the internal variability, and the linearity of the forced response to make global temperature projections based on historical data and a Green's function, or Climate Response Function (CRF). To make the problem tractable, we take advantage of the temporal scaling symmetry to define a scaling CRF characterized by the scaling exponent H, which controls the long-range memory of the climate, i.e. how fast the system tends toward a steady-state, and an inner scale τ ≈ 2   years below which the higher-frequency response is smoothed out. An aerosol scaling factor and a non-linear volcanic damping exponent were introduced to account for the large uncertainty in these forcings. We estimate the model and forcing parameters by Bayesian inference which allows us to analytically calculate the transient climate response and the equilibrium climate sensitivity as: 1 . 7 - 0.2 + 0.3   K and 2 . 4 - 0.6 + 1.3   K respectively (likely range). Projections to 2100 according to the RCP 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios yield warmings with respect to 1880-1910 of: 1 . 5 - 0.2 + 0.4 K , 2 . 3 - 0.5 + 0.7   K and 4 . 2 - 0.9 + 1.3   K. These projection estimates are lower than the ones based on a Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 multi-model ensemble; more importantly, their uncertainties are smaller and only depend on historical temperature and forcing series. The key uncertainty is due to aerosol forcings; we find a modern (2005) forcing value of [ - 1.0 , - 0.3 ] Wm - 2 (90 % confidence interval) with median at - 0.7 Wm - 2 . Projecting to 2100, we find that to keep the warming below 1.5 K, future emissions must undergo cuts similar to RCP 2.6 for which the probability to remain under 1.5 K is 48 %. RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5-like futures overshoot with very high probability.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate sensitivity; Global mean temperature; Global warming; Projections; RCP scenarios; Scaling

Year:  2020        PMID: 33603281      PMCID: PMC7870646          DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05521-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clim Dyn        ISSN: 0930-7575            Impact factor:   4.375


  14 in total

1.  Defusing the global warming time bomb.

Authors:  James Hansen
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum.

Authors:  Andreas Schmittner; Nathan M Urban; Jeremy D Shakun; Natalie M Mahowald; Peter U Clark; Patrick J Bartlein; Alan C Mix; Antoni Rosell-Melé
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models.

Authors:  Reto Knutti; Maria A A Rugenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Significant decadal-scale impact of volcanic eruptions on sea level and ocean heat content.

Authors:  John A Church; Neil J White; Julie M Arblaster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries.

Authors:  Gabriele C Hegerl; Thomas J Crowley; William T Hyde; David J Frame
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Links between annual, Milankovitch and continuum temperature variability.

Authors:  Peter Huybers; William Curry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C.

Authors:  Malte Meinshausen; Nicolai Meinshausen; William Hare; Sarah C B Raper; Katja Frieler; Reto Knutti; David J Frame; Myles R Allen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The runaway greenhouse: implications for future climate change, geoengineering and planetary atmospheres.

Authors:  Colin Goldblatt; Andrew J Watson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The ocean's role in polar climate change: asymmetric Arctic and Antarctic responses to greenhouse gas and ozone forcing.

Authors:  John Marshall; Kyle C Armour; Jeffery R Scott; Yavor Kostov; Ute Hausmann; David Ferreira; Theodore G Shepherd; Cecilia M Bitz
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.