L Saba1, S Zucca2, A Gupta3, G Micheletti2, J S Suri3, A Balestrieri2, M Porcu2, P Crivelli4, G Lanzino5, Y Qi6, V Nardi5, G Faa2, R Montisci2. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (L.S., S.Z., G.M., A.B., M.P.), Pathology (G.F.), and Vascular Surgery (R.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy; Department of Radiology (A.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York lucasaba@tiscali.it. 2. From the Departments of Radiology (L.S., S.Z., G.M., A.B., M.P.), Pathology (G.F.), and Vascular Surgery (R.M.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy; Department of Radiology (A.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division (J.S.S.), AtheroPoint (TM), Roseville, California. 4. Department of Radiology (P.C.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Sassari, Italy. 5. Department of Neurologic Surgery (G.L., V.N.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Xuanwu Hospital (Y.Q.), Capital Medical University Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inflammatory changes in the fat tissue surrounding the coronary arteries have been associated with coronary artery disease and high-risk vulnerable plaques. Our aim was to investigate possible correlations between the presence and degree of perivascular fat density and a marker of vulnerable carotid plaque, namely contrast plaque enhancement on CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred patients (76 men, 24 women; mean age, 69 years) who underwent CT angiography for investigation of carotid artery stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. Contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density were measured in 100 carotid arteries, and values were stratified according to symptomatic (ipsilateral-to-cerebrovascular symptoms)/asymptomatic status (carotid artery with the most severe degree of stenosis). Correlation coefficients (Pearson ρ product moment) were calculated between the contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density. The differences among the correlation ρ values were calculated using the Fisher r-to-z transformation. Mann-Whitney analysis was also calculated to test differences between the groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant positive correlation between contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density (ρ value = 0.6582, P value = .001). The correlation was stronger for symptomatic rather than asymptomatic patients (ρ value = 0.7052, P value = .001 versus ρ value = 0.4092, P value = .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive association between perivascular fat density and contrast plaque enhancement on CTA. This correlation was stronger for symptomatic rather than asymptomatic patients. Our results suggest that perivascular fat density could be used as an indirect marker of plaque instability.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inflammatory changes in the fat tissue surrounding the coronary arteries have been associated with coronary artery disease and high-risk vulnerable plaques. Our aim was to investigate possible correlations between the presence and degree of perivascular fat density and a marker of vulnerable carotid plaque, namely contrast plaque enhancement on CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred patients (76 men, 24 women; mean age, 69 years) who underwent CT angiography for investigation of carotid artery stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. Contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density were measured in 100 carotid arteries, and values were stratified according to symptomatic (ipsilateral-to-cerebrovascular symptoms)/asymptomatic status (carotid artery with the most severe degree of stenosis). Correlation coefficients (Pearson ρ product moment) were calculated between the contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density. The differences among the correlation ρ values were calculated using the Fisher r-to-z transformation. Mann-Whitney analysis was also calculated to test differences between the groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant positive correlation between contrast plaque enhancement and perivascular fat density (ρ value = 0.6582, P value = .001). The correlation was stronger for symptomatic rather than asymptomatic patients (ρ value = 0.7052, P value = .001 versus ρ value = 0.4092, P value = .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive association between perivascular fat density and contrast plaque enhancement on CTA. This correlation was stronger for symptomatic rather than asymptomatic patients. Our results suggest that perivascular fat density could be used as an indirect marker of plaque instability.
Authors: Leticia Fernández-Friera; Valentín Fuster; Beatriz López-Melgar; Belén Oliva; Javier Sánchez-González; Angel Macías; Braulio Pérez-Asenjo; Daniel Zamudio; Juan C Alonso-Farto; Samuel España; José Mendiguren; Héctor Bueno; Jose M García-Ruiz; Borja Ibañez; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Javier Sanz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: L Saba; G Lanzino; P Lucatelli; F Lavra; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; C Yuan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Luca Saba; Tobias Saam; H Rolf Jäger; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; David Saloner; Bruce A Wasserman; Leo H Bonati; Max Wintermark Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Michael T Lu; Jakob Park; Khristine Ghemigian; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Ting Liu; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson; Quynh A Truong; Maros Ferencik; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Klara J Rosenquist; Alison Pedley; Joseph M Massaro; Kate E Therkelsen; Joanne M Murabito; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-05-08