PURPOSE: Carotid plaques analysed by MDCTA can show contrast enhancement. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between carotid plaque enhancement (CPE) and microvessel density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained IRB approval. Twenty-nine consecutive (male, 20; median age, 63) symptomatic patients studied with 16-detector CT were prospectively analysed. Examinations were performed before and after intravenous contrast medium administration, and analysis of plaque enhancement was performed. Patients underwent "en bloc" carotid endarterectomy; histological sections were prepared and the presence of microvessels quantified. Logistic regression analysis as well as ROC curve and area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: A statistically significant association between the degree of CPE and microvessel density (P = 0.009; rho = 0.553) was observed. The ROC curve analysis confirmed this association with an area under the curve of 0.906, 0.735, 0.644 and 0.546 for CPE of 10 HU, 15 HU, 20 HU and 25 HU respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the CPE and the degree of neovascularisation (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Results of this preliminary study suggest that CPE might be associated with the microvessel density. Histological analysis seems to demonstrate that the degree of intra-plaque neo-vascularisation is statistically associated with CPE. KEY POINTS: Carotid artery plaque enhancement at CT is associated with microvessel density. The degree of intra-plaque neo-vascularisation is statistically associated with carotid plaque enhancement. Plaque enhancement at CT should be considered when assessing vulnerable plaques.
PURPOSE: Carotid plaques analysed by MDCTA can show contrast enhancement. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between carotid plaque enhancement (CPE) and microvessel density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained IRB approval. Twenty-nine consecutive (male, 20; median age, 63) symptomatic patients studied with 16-detector CT were prospectively analysed. Examinations were performed before and after intravenous contrast medium administration, and analysis of plaque enhancement was performed. Patients underwent "en bloc" carotid endarterectomy; histological sections were prepared and the presence of microvessels quantified. Logistic regression analysis as well as ROC curve and area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: A statistically significant association between the degree of CPE and microvessel density (P = 0.009; rho = 0.553) was observed. The ROC curve analysis confirmed this association with an area under the curve of 0.906, 0.735, 0.644 and 0.546 for CPE of 10 HU, 15 HU, 20 HU and 25 HU respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the CPE and the degree of neovascularisation (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Results of this preliminary study suggest that CPE might be associated with the microvessel density. Histological analysis seems to demonstrate that the degree of intra-plaque neo-vascularisation is statistically associated with CPE. KEY POINTS: Carotid artery plaque enhancement at CT is associated with microvessel density. The degree of intra-plaque neo-vascularisation is statistically associated with carotid plaque enhancement. Plaque enhancement at CT should be considered when assessing vulnerable plaques.
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Sander Cretier; Harald C Groen; Philip Homburg; Hamit Cakir; Jolanda J Wentzel; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan R Moody; Rachael E Murphy; Paul S Morgan; Anne L Martel; G S Delay; Steve Allder; Shane T MacSweeney; William G Tennant; John Gladman; John Lowe; Beverley J Hunt Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Luca Saba; Michele Anzidei; Mario Piga; Federica Ciolina; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Catalano; Jasjit S Suri; Eytan Raz Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2014-06
Authors: L Saba; H Chen; R Cau; G D Rubeis; G Zhu; F Pisu; B Jang; G Lanzino; J S Suri; Y Qi; M Wintermark Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Saba; C Loewe; T Weikert; M C Williams; N Galea; R P J Budde; R Vliegenthart; B K Velthuis; M Francone; J Bremerich; L Natale; K Nikolaou; J N Dacher; C Peebles; F Caobelli; A Redheuil; M Dewey; K F Kreitner; R Salgado Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: L Saba; S Zucca; A Gupta; G Micheletti; J S Suri; A Balestrieri; M Porcu; P Crivelli; G Lanzino; Y Qi; V Nardi; G Faa; R Montisci Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Saba; M Francone; P P Bassareo; L Lai; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; C N De Cecco; G Faa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.825