Literature DB >> 31571042

Association between carotid 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT with ischemic vascular brain disease on MRI in patients with carotid artery disease.

Kengo Fujimoto1, Takashi Norikane1, Yuka Yamamoto2, Yasukage Takami1, Katsuya Mitamura1, Masaki Okada3, Tetsuhiro Hatakeyama3, Masahiko Kawanishi3, Yoshihiro Nishiyama1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerosis is a dynamic and complex process characterized by the formation and progression of plaque mediated by various pathophysiologic steps including inflammation and calcification. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between carotid 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake with the severity of ischemic vascular brain disease on MRI in patients with carotid artery disease.
METHODS: A total of 28 patients who were scheduled to undergo clinically indicated carotid endarterectomy or stenting for carotid artery disease were examined with 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT and brain MRI. The PET/CT images were evaluated by qualitative and semiquantitative analyses. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) for the plaque and the average of mean SUV within the lumen of both internal jugular veins was calculated, and the target-to-blood pool ratio (TBR) was determined. The ischemic vascular brain disease on MRI was graded separately in the bilateral hemisphere as 0, 1, 2, and 3, with 0 being absent and 3 being the most severe.
RESULTS: In two patients, only a unilateral carotid artery was analyzed because of previous indwelling stent. 18F-NaF focal uptake was observed in 50 carotid arteries. 18F-FDG focal uptake was observed in 47 carotid arteries. The mean (± SD) 18F-NaF TBR (2.93 ± 0.89) was significantly higher than the mean (± SD) 18F-FDG TBR (2.41 ± 0.84) (p < 0.001). The mean (± SD) values of 18F-NaF TBR were 2.63 ± 0.76 in grade 1, 2.90 ± 0.91 in grade 2, and 3.81 ± 0.60 in grade 3. Significant differences in 18F-NaF TBR were observed between grades 1 and 3 (p < 0.001) and grades 2 and 3 (p = 0.02). The mean (± SD) values of 18F-FDG TBR were 2.35 ± 0.77 in grade 1, 2.23 ± 0.48 in grade 2, and 2.87 ± 1.32 in grade 3. No significant differences in 18F-FDG TBR were noted between any of the ischemic vascular brain disease grades.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that carotid 18F-NaF uptake in patients with carotid artery disease may be associated with the severity of the ischemic vascular brain disease observed on MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; 18F-NaF; Atherosclerosis; Carotid artery; PET

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31571042     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01403-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and morphological criteria of vulnerability in carotid artery plaque using hybrid 18F-NaF PET/MRI.

Authors:  Laura Mechtouff; Monica Sigovan; Philippe Douek; Nicolas Costes; Didier Le Bars; Adeline Mansuy; Julie Haesebaert; Alexandre Bani-Sadr; Jérémie Tordo; Patrick Feugier; Antoine Millon; Stéphane Luong; Salim Si-Mohamed; Diane Collet-Benzaquen; Emmanuelle Canet-Soulas; Thomas Bochaton; Claire Crola Da Silva; Alexandre Paccalet; David Magne; Yves Berthezene; Norbert Nighoghossian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 2.  "Vascular inflammation and cardiovascular disease: review about the role of PET imaging".

Authors:  Antonio Maria Sammartino; Raffaele Falco; Andrea Drera; Francesco Dondi; Pietro Bellini; Francesco Bertagna; Enrico Vizzardi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Carotid Plaque Composition and the Importance of Non-Invasive in Imaging Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Martin Andreas Geiger; Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Wagner Mauad Avelar; Carla Fingerhut; Sokrates Stein; Ana Terezinha Guillaumon
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Perivascular Fat Density and Contrast Plaque Enhancement: Does a Correlation Exist?

Authors:  L Saba; S Zucca; A Gupta; G Micheletti; J S Suri; A Balestrieri; M Porcu; P Crivelli; G Lanzino; Y Qi; V Nardi; G Faa; R Montisci
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Atherosclerosis Imaging with 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET.

Authors:  Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Reza Piri; Caius Constantinescu; Kasper Karmark Iversen; Thomas J Werner; Michael Sturek; Abass Alavi; Oke Gerke
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.