| Literature DB >> 32726136 |
Vu Nguyen Quynh Anh1, Nguyen Van Ba2, Do Tram Anh3, Nguyen Dinh Ung1, Nguyen Hoang Hiep1, Vu Thi Ly1, Dinh Thi Thu Hang4, Bui Tien Sy5, Hoang Dao Chinh6, Le Minh Ky7, Vu Truong Phong7, Nguyen Kim Luu8, Nguyen Thanh Trung9, Ho Anh Son4, Hoang Van Luong4, Nghiem Duc Thuan3, Ngo Thanh Tung10, Ho Huu Tho1.
Abstract
Quantification of plasma cell-free Epstein Barr virus DNA (cf EBV DNA) has been suggested as a promising liquid biopsy assay for screening and early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the diagnostic value of this assay is currently not known in the population of Vietnam, one of the countries which contributed the most to the NPC cases. Herein, we have reported a highly sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assay targeting cf EBV DNA for the detection of NPC. A standard curve with linear regression, R 2 = 0.9961 (range: 25-150 000 copies/mL) and a detection limit of 25 copies/mL were obtained using an EBV standard panel provided by the Chinese University of Hong Kong. The clinical performance of this assay was assessed using plasma samples obtained from 261 Vietnamese individuals. The optimized qPCR assay detected cf EBV DNA in plasma with a sensitivity of 97.4% and a specificity of 98.2%. The absolute quantitative results of pretreatment cf EBV DNA and patient overall clinical stages were statistically correlated (P < .05). In summary, the remarkably high sensitivity and specificity of our optimized qPCR assay strongly supports the wide use of cf EBV DNA quantification as a routine noninvasive method in early diagnosis and management of patients with NPC.Entities:
Keywords: Vietnam; cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA; early detection of cancer; liquid biopsy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; quantitative PCR
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726136 PMCID: PMC7658724 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820944286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Control ISSN: 1073-2748 Impact factor: 3.302
Demographic Characteristics of 152 Patients.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Ethnicity, n (%) | |
| Northern Vietnam | 125 (82) |
| Central Vietnam | 27 (18) |
| Gender, n (%) | |
| Male | 98 (65) |
| Female | 54 (35) |
| Age, years | |
| Median | 50 |
| Range | 18-77 |
| Age distribution, years (%) | |
| <30 | 7 (5) |
| 30-39 | 31 (20) |
| 40-49 | 35 (23) |
| 50-59 | 38 (25) |
| ≥60 | 41 (27) |
| T stage, n (%) | |
| 1 | 48 (32) |
| 2 | 40 (26) |
| 3 | 27 (18) |
| 4 | 37 (24) |
| N stage, n (%) | |
| 0 | 25 (16) |
| 1 | 54 (36) |
| 2 | 42 (28) |
| 3 | 25 (16) |
| Undefined | 6 (4) |
| Overall stage, n (%) | |
| I and II | 46 (30) |
| III and IV | 106 (70) |
Figure 1.Optimization of the primer concentrations for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. 0.1Q, 0.2Q, 0.3Q, 0.4Q, and 0.5Q indicated primer concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 µM, respectively, in qPCR reactions with the same amount of DNA template. am Q was the negative control with primer concentration of 0.2 µM. As a result, the optimal primer concentration for the qPCR assay was determined to be 0.2 µM.
Figure 2.Optimization of the Taqman probe concentration. Three different titers of Taqman probe at −0.2, 0.1, and 0.05 µM were used with the same amount of template DNA. (35 0.2_1-) was the negative control with a primer concentration of 0.2 µM and probe concentration of 0.2 µM.
Figure 3.Optimization of the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) concentration. Different concentrations of DMSO: 0% (SS_Q), 2.5% (2.5%_Q), 5% (5%_Q), 7.5% (7.5%_Q), and 10% (10%_Q) were tested against intact conditions of primer, probe, and DNA template concentrations. The sample with 2.5% of DMSO (2.5%_Q) gave the earliest amplification signal among those samples and therefore was chosen to be the optimal DMSO concentration for our polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.
Assay Precision Evaluated by Ct Values Obtained From Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis of Standard EBV DNA.
| Level | Average observed EBV DNA titer (log10 copies/mL) | Within-run precision | Between-run precision | Total precision | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | ||
| 1 | 6.079 | 0.081 | 0% | 0.277 | 1% | 0.231 | 1% |
| 2 | 5.079 | 0.081 | 0% | 0.192 | 1% | 0.166 | 1% |
| 3 | 4.380 | 0.195 | 1% | 0.287 | 1% | 0.263 | 1% |
| 4 | 4.079 | 0.170 | 1% | 0.658 | 2% | 0.594 | 2% |
| 5 | 3.778 | 0.918 | 3% | 0.488 | 1% | 0.766 | 2% |
Abbreviation: CV, coefficient of variation; EBV, Epstein Barr virus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 4.Linearity of the optimized quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay for plasma cell-free Epstein Barr virus DNA (cf EBV DNA) quantification based on international EBV standard panel. The log of known concentrations of standard (150 000, 60 000, 6000, 1200, 600, 300, 150, 50, 25 copies/mL) on the x-axis is plotted against the corresponding Ct values on the y-axis. A linear range for quantitative PCR detection of cf EBV DNA (50-150 000 copies/mL) was obtained with a detection limit of 25 copies/mL.
Distribution of NPC Patients (N = 152) by Mean of EBV DNA Load.
| EBV-DNA titer (copies/mL) | EBV-DNA- negative patients, n = 4 (2.63%) | EBV-DNA- positive patients, n = 148 (97.3%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| >0 | <300 | n.a | 35 (23.03%) |
| ≥300 | n.a | 113 (74.34%) | |
| Min | 0 | 13 | |
| Max | 0 | 383,000 | |
| Mean | 0 | 12,327 | |
| SEM | 0 | 3087 | |
Abbreviations: EBV, Epstein Barr virus; n.a, not applicable; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; SEM, standard error of the mean.
a Three levels of EBV DNA (0, <300, and ≥300 copies/mL) were used to categorize diagnosed participants.
Distributions of NPC Patients by Overall Clinical Stages and Relationships with their EBV DNA Levels.
| Variable | No. of patients (N = 152) | Undetectable EBV DNA, n (%) | EBV DNA (copies/mL) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <300 copies/mL, n (%) | ≥300 copies/mL, n (%) | Mean ± SE (range) | ||||
| Stage I and II | 46 | 2 (4.3%) | 13 (28.3%) | 31 (67.4%) | 6920 ± 2314 (0-73 000 copies/mL) | .016 |
| Stage III and IV | 106 | 2 (1.9%) | 22 (20.8%) | 82 (77.4%) | 15 116 ± 4299 (0-383 000 copies/mL) | |
Abbreviations: EBV, Epstein Barr virus; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; SE, standard error.
a Comparison was performed using Pearson χ2 test.