PURPOSE: To compare the performance of three PCR assays in measuring circulating Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). DNA levels in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and to confirm its prognostic significance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Plasma from 58 newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were collected before, during, and every 3 to 6 months after radiotherapy. EBV DNA levels were determined by real-time quantitative PCR using primer/probe sets for polymerase-1 (Pol-1), latent membrane protein 2 (Lmp2), and BamHI-W. Pretreatment levels from the three assays were correlated with each other and serial measurements from the Pol-1 assay were correlated with clinical variables. RESULTS: Pol-1 was more accurate than BamHI-W in predicting EBV DNA concentrations in cell lines. Of the three assays, BamHI-W yielded the highest concentrations followed by Pol-1 in plasmas (n = 23). The correlation coefficient was 0.99 (P < 0.0001) for Pol-1 and Lmp2, 0.66 (P < 0.0001) for Pol-1 and BamHI-W, and 0.55 (P < 0.0001) for BamHI-W and Lmp2. Elevated pretreatment DNA levels as detected by Pol-1 were correlated with advanced nodal stage (P = 0.04) and overall stage (P = 0.028). There was no correlation between pretreatment EBV DNA levels and freedom-from-relapse or overall survival; however, there was a significant correlation between posttreatment levels and these variables. The 2-year freedom-from-relapse and overall survival rates were 92% and 94% for patients with undetectable, and 37% and 55% for those with detectable, posttreatment levels (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The three PCR assays yielded similar results in detecting EBV DNA in plasmas. The Pol-1-detected posttreatment EBV DNA level was the strongest predictor for treatment outcomes.
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of three PCR assays in measuring circulating Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). DNA levels in nasopharyngeal carcinomapatients and to confirm its prognostic significance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Plasma from 58 newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinomapatients were collected before, during, and every 3 to 6 months after radiotherapy. EBV DNA levels were determined by real-time quantitative PCR using primer/probe sets for polymerase-1 (Pol-1), latent membrane protein 2 (Lmp2), and BamHI-W. Pretreatment levels from the three assays were correlated with each other and serial measurements from the Pol-1 assay were correlated with clinical variables. RESULTS: Pol-1 was more accurate than BamHI-W in predicting EBV DNA concentrations in cell lines. Of the three assays, BamHI-W yielded the highest concentrations followed by Pol-1 in plasmas (n = 23). The correlation coefficient was 0.99 (P < 0.0001) for Pol-1 and Lmp2, 0.66 (P < 0.0001) for Pol-1 and BamHI-W, and 0.55 (P < 0.0001) for BamHI-W and Lmp2. Elevated pretreatment DNA levels as detected by Pol-1 were correlated with advanced nodal stage (P = 0.04) and overall stage (P = 0.028). There was no correlation between pretreatment EBV DNA levels and freedom-from-relapse or overall survival; however, there was a significant correlation between posttreatment levels and these variables. The 2-year freedom-from-relapse and overall survival rates were 92% and 94% for patients with undetectable, and 37% and 55% for those with detectable, posttreatment levels (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The three PCR assays yielded similar results in detecting EBV DNA in plasmas. The Pol-1-detected posttreatment EBV DNA level was the strongest predictor for treatment outcomes.
Authors: Hongbin Cao; Alice Banh; Shirley Kwok; Xiaoli Shi; Simon Wu; Trevor Krakow; Brian Khong; Brindha Bavan; Rajeev Bala; Benjamin A Pinsky; Dimitrios Colevas; Nader Pourmand; Albert C Koong; Christina S Kong; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kelly Y Kim; Quynh-Thu Le; Sue S Yom; Benjamin A Pinsky; Scott V Bratman; Raymond H W Ng; Haja S El Mubarak; K C Allen Chan; Miriam Sander; Barbara A Conley Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Quynh Thu Le; A Dimitrios Colevas; Brian O'Sullivan; Anne W M Lee; Nancy Lee; Brigette Ma; Lillian L Siu; John Waldron; Chwee-Ming Lim; Nadeem Riaz; Jean Lynn; Shakun Malik Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Quynh-Thu Le; Qiang Zhang; Hongbin Cao; Ann-Joy Cheng; Benjamin A Pinsky; Ruey-Long Hong; Joseph T Chang; Chun-Wei Wang; Kuo-Chien Tsao; Ym Dennis Lo; Nancy Lee; K Kian Ang; Anthony T C Chan; K C Allen Chan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew E Spector; Janice L Farlow; Catherine T Haring; J Chad Brenner; Andrew C Birkeland Journal: Discov Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.970
Authors: Janaki Abeynayake; Ryan Johnson; Paolo Libiran; Malaya K Sahoo; Hongbin Cao; Raffick Bowen; K C Allen Chan; Quynh-Thu Le; Benjamin A Pinsky Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 5.948