| Literature DB >> 32723110 |
Qiuping Ning1,2,3, Tiebing Fan4, Jinyang Tang5, Shuhua Han5, Wensheng Wang3, Hua Ren3, Haiyi Wang2, Huiyi Ye2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation-iron quantification (IDEAL-IQ) is a noninvasive and objective method used to quantitatively measure fat content. Although this technique has been used in the entire abdomen, IDEAL-IQ findings in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) have rarely been reported. This preclinical study was performed to quantify the amount of fat in the SIJ in healthy volunteers by IDEAL-IQ.Entities:
Keywords: IDEAL-IQ; Sacroiliac joint; ankylosing spondylitis; fat fraction; magnetic resonance imaging; multivariate analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32723110 PMCID: PMC7391443 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520931281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Comparison of Fi and Fs in the same age group and across different age groups (±s).
| Age group (years) | Fi (%) | Fs (%) | Sex (male) | Age (years) | BMI (kg/m2) |
|
| Difference in Fi(95% CI) |
| Difference in Fs(95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–30a | 48.12 ± 15.82 | 46.58 ± 12.31 | 15 | 23.77 ± 3.87 | 23.28 ± 4.15 | 0.922 | 0.366 | 5.54 (−15.03 to 3.96) | 0.246ab | −13.48 (−22.18 to −4.78) | 0.003 |
| 31–50b | 53.66 ± 11.70 | 60.06 ± 14.83 | 9 | 38.60 ± 6.40 | 22.56 ± 0.69 | −3.251 | 0.006 | −13.61 (−22.45 to −4.79) | 0.003 | −21.17 (−29.72 to −12.61) | <0.001 |
| ≥51c | 61.74 ± 12.46 | 67.74 ± 16.18 | 8 | 59.63 ± 6.69 | 21.98 ± 3.53 | −2.397 | 0.028* | −8.08 (−16.62 to 0.46) | 0.063bc | −7.68 (−18.66 to 3.29) | 0.164bc |
Fi, fat fraction on the iliac side; Fs, fat fraction on the sacral side; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Superscripts a, b, and c indicate different P values in different age groups.
Comparison of Fi and Fs between men and women in different age groups.
| Age group (years) | Index | Men | Women |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–30 | Fi (%) | 45.17 ± 10.81 | 52.14 ± 20.77 | −1.017 | 0.327 |
| Fs (%) | 44.99 ± 10.77 | 48.73 ± 14.42 | −0.758 | 0.456 | |
| 31–50 | Fi (%) | 53.66 ± 12.31 | 53.66 ± 11.88 | 0.001 | 1.000 |
| Fs (%) | 58.02 ± 15.92 | 63.11 ± 13.83 | −0.637 | 0.535 | |
| ≥51 | Fi (%) | 53.49 ± 8.27 | 67.74 ± 11.73 | −2.936 | 0.009** |
| Fs (%) | 54.71 ± 15.23 | 77.23 ± 8.58 | −3.769 | 0.004** |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Fi, fat fraction on the iliac side; Fs, fat fraction on the sacral side.
**P < 0.01
Comparison of BMI between men and women in different age groups.
| Age group (years) | Men | Women |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–30 | 23.12 ± 2.79 | 23.50 ± 5.66 | −0.229 | 0.821 |
| 31–50 | 22.43 ± 2.62 | 22.74 ± 3.03 | −0.212 | 0.693 |
| ≥51 | 19.85 ± 3.20 | 23.53 ± 2.99 | −2.573 | 0.930 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
BMI, body mass index; Fi, fat fraction on the iliac side; Fs, fat fraction on the sacral side.
Correlation of Fi and Fs with sex, age, and BMI.
| Age group (years) | Sex (r, | Age (r, | BMI (r, |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fi | |||
| 15–30 | 0.149, 0.377 | −0.081, 0.578 | −0.025, 0.860 |
| 31–50 | 0.040, 0.860 | 0.207, 0.294 | 0.125, 0.519 |
| ≥51 | 0.491, | 0.236, 0.169 | 0.082, 0.624 |
| Fs | |||
| 15–30 | 0.166, 0.323 | −0.016, 0.911 | −0.031, 0.825 |
| 31–50 | 0.133, 0.556 | 0.167, 0.396 | 0.134, 0.488 |
| ≥51 | 0.589, | 0.453, | 0.223, 0.183 |
Fi, fat fraction on the iliac side; Fs, fat fraction on the sacral side; BMI, body mass index.
*P < 0.05; *P < 0.005.