Literature DB >> 23382293

Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy.

Ilkay S Idilman1, Hatice Aniktar, Ramazan Idilman, Gokhan Kabacam, Berna Savas, Atilla Elhan, Azim Celik, Kadir Bahar, Musturay Karcaaltincaba.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine utility of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements for quantifying the liver fat content in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and compare these results with liver biopsy findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with waivers of informed consent. Between June 2010 and April 2011, 86 patients received a diagnosis of NAFLD. Ten patients did not accept liver biopsy and six patients had contraindications for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Seventy patients were included in this study. Seventy patients with NAFLD (40 men, 30 women; mean age, 44.7 years; range, 16-69 years) underwent T1-independent volumetric multiecho gradient-echo imaging with T2* correction and spectral fat modeling. Median time interval between MR imaging and liver biopsy was 14.5 days (range, 0-259 days). MR examinations were performed with a 1.5-T MR imaging system. Complex-based PDFF measurements were performed by placing regions of interest in Couinaud system segments V-VI and all liver segments from I to VIII. All liver biopsy specimens were retrieved from archives and evaluated by one pathologist for hepatic steatosis according to criteria from a previous study. Pearson correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristics, and linear regression analyses were used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Mean PDFF calculated with MR imaging was 18.1% ± 9.5 (standard deviation). Close correlation for quantification of hepatic steatosis was observed between PDFF and liver biopsy (r = 0.82). PDFF was effective in discriminating moderate or severe hepatic steatosis from mild or no hepatic steatosis, with area under the curve of 0.95. The correlation between biopsy and PDFF-determined steatosis was less pronounced when fibrosis was present (r = 0.60) than when fibrosis was absent (r = 0.86; P = .02).
CONCLUSION: PDFF measurement by MR imaging provided a noninvasive, accurate estimation of the presence and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatic fibrosis reduced the correlation between biopsy results and PDFF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382293     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  117 in total

1.  Effect of gadolinium on hepatic fat quantification using multi-echo reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation.

Authors:  Mingmei Ge; Jing Zhang; Bing Wu; Zhiqin Liu; Hai Song; Xiangfeng Meng; Xinhuai Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Hepatic fat quantification using the proton density fat fraction (PDFF): utility of free-drawn-PDFF with a large coverage area.

Authors:  Kun Young Kim; Ji Soo Song; Stephan Kannengiesser; Young Min Han
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation: outcomes and advances.

Authors:  Adnan Said
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Free-breathing liver fat and R 2 quantification using motion-corrected averaging based on a nonlocal means algorithm.

Authors:  Huiwen Luo; Ante Zhu; Curtis N Wiens; Jitka Starekova; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Liver fat imaging-a clinical overview of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Free-breathing quantification of hepatic fat in healthy children and children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using a multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial MRI technique.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Karrie V Ly; Smruthi Murthy; Shahnaz Ghahremani; Grace Hyun J Kim; Kara L Calkins; Holden H Wu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04

7.  Contributions of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Gastroenterological Practice: MRIs for GIs.

Authors:  Christopher G Roth; Dina Halegoua-De Marzio; Flavius F Guglielmo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah I Awai; Kimberly P Newton; Claude B Sirlin; Cynthia Behling; Jeffrey B Schwimmer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Transient elastography (FibroScan(®)) with controlled attenuation parameter in the assessment of liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - Where do we stand?

Authors:  Ivana Mikolasevic; Lidija Orlic; Neven Franjic; Goran Hauser; Davor Stimac; Sandra Milic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  [Functional MR imaging of the liver].

Authors:  A Wibmer; R Nolz; M Trauner; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.