| Literature DB >> 32709903 |
Mingze Tang1, Lin Li1,2, Xiaolong Wang1,2, Jian You1, Jiangnan Li1, Xia Chen3.
Abstract
To reveal the self-coordination mechanism of the fragile ecosystem of alpine tundra, we explored the relationship between soil microorganisms and other elements. On theEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32709903 PMCID: PMC7381615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69441-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Real-time PCR quantification of the C- and N-cycling function genes (aomA bacterial amoA, Arch-amoA archaeal amoA, nifH nitrogen-fixing bacteria functional gene, nosZ denitrifying bacteria functional gene, cbbl carbon-fixing bacteria functional gene) in the bulk soil under seven elevations. The copy number of genes in each gram of dry soil was estimated based on the results of real-time PCR (copies per ng DNA). The standard curve of all these genes was > 0.99. Each sample was measured in triplicate. (B–F) Pearson correlations between C- and N-cycling function genes abundance and pH-value. (B) was bacterial amoA; (C) was archaeal amoA; (D) was nifH; (E) was nosZ and (F) was cbbl correlation with pH. Pearson correlations between C- and N-cycling function genes abundance and other indexes see Supplementary Table S2.
The alpha diversity difference between seven elevation treatments.
| Chao1 | Observed species | PD whole_tree | Shannon | Simpson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,600 m | 1,207.291 | 1,049.333 | 60.10461 | 8.382897 | 0.991891 |
| 2,500 m | 896.4872 | 746.3333 | 45.823 | 7.435108 | 0.987337 |
| 2,400 m | 1,089.604 | 902.3333 | 55.01141 | 7.662607 | 0.987238 |
| 2,300 m | 913.1888 | 757 | 46.78453 | 7.431501 | 0.985501 |
| 2,200 m | 1,240.182 | 988 | 57.33918 | 7.842169 | 0.985375 |
| 2,100 m | 1,017.882 | 830.3333 | 51.05846 | 7.643039 | 0.988449 |
| 2000 m | 1,118.46 | 908.3333 | 52.47835 | 7.637198 | 0.984229 |
| 0.173 |
Bolded values indicate significant (P < 0.05, ANOVA) effects.
Figure 2Relative abundances of the dominant bacterial phyla in soils separated according to elevation and species categories. Relative abundances are based on the proportional frequencies of those DNA sequences that could be classified at the phylum level. (A) was separated according to elevation categories; (B) was separated according to species categories at seven elevations.
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of community composition based on pyrosequencing of (A) microbial communities of seven elevations and (B) microbial communities of Da (the independent community of R. aureum Georgi), Da + S (R. aureum Georgi lives with other shrub), Da + H (R. aureum Georgi lives with herbaceous). Distances for (A,B) are based on weighted Unifrac scores. Bray-Stress for (A,B) are 0.134 and 0.082.
Figure 4(A) Ergosterol (mg g−1) in rhizosphere soil for different species on the seven elevations. (B–F) Real-time PCR quantification of the C- and N-cycling function genes in the rhizosphere soil under different species on the seven elevations. (B) is bacterial amoA, (C) is archaeal amoA; (C) is nifH; (D) is nosZ and (F) is cbbl.
Figure 5(A) Pairwise comparison of β-diversity with all samples and annotations. Clustering and heatmap were computed using the weighted Unifrac scores. (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis of microbial communities for Da at seven elevations based on pyrosequencing data.
Figure 6(A) Redundancy analysis (RDA) triplots of 16S rDNA fingerprint patterns, showing the contribution of 14 environmental parameters to variability. Arrows indicate environmental factors and their relative effects on microbial community structure. The red triangles indicate Da; yellow triangles indicate Da + S; green triangles indicate Da + H. Eigenvalues of RDA1 and RDA2 are 0.336 and 0.2436. (B) A structural equation model (SEM) showing the causal influences of soil TOC, pH, species cover degree, elevation, OTU richness, fungal biomass and microbial communities in the soil. The width of arrows indicates the strength of the causal effect. The numbers above the arrows indicate path coefficients (*indicate significant (P < 0.05) effects, **indicate significant (P < 0.01) effects, ***indicate significant (P < 0.001) effects). Bold and dashed lines indicate positive and negative effects respectively. R2 values represent the proportion of the variance explained for each variable.
Direct, indirect and total effect coefficients of each variable.
Stronger colours (red is positive, blue is negative) in the heatmap represent stronger effect.