Literature DB >> 21895388

A 2.5-D representation of the human hand.

Matthew R Longo1, Patrick Haggard.   

Abstract

Primary somatosensory maps in the brain represent the body as a discontinuous, fragmented set of two-dimensional (2-D) skin regions. We nevertheless experience our body as a coherent three-dimensional (3-D) volumetric object. The links between these different aspects of body representation, however, remain poorly understood. Perceiving the body's location in external space requires that immediate afferent signals from the periphery be combined with stored representations of body size and shape. At least for the back of the hand, this body representation is massively distorted, in a highly stereotyped manner. Here we test whether a common pattern of distortions applies to the entire hand as a 3-D object, or whether each 2-D skin surface has its own characteristic pattern of distortion. Participants judged the location in external space of landmark points on the dorsal and palmar surfaces of the hand. By analyzing the internal configuration of judgments, we produced implicit maps of each skin surface. Qualitatively similar distortions were observed in both cases. The distortions were correlated across participants, suggesting that the two surfaces are bound into a common underlying representation. The magnitude of distortion, however, was substantially smaller on the palmar surface, suggesting that this binding is incomplete. The implicit representation of the human hand may be a hybrid, intermediate between a 2-D representation of individual skin surfaces and a 3-D representation of the hand as a volumetric object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895388     DOI: 10.1037/a0025428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  24 in total

1.  Somatosensory cortical representation of the body size.

Authors:  Serena Giurgola; Alberto Pisoni; Angelo Maravita; Giuseppe Vallar; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Long- but not short-term tool-use changes hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Jason P Schacher; Cory Scammel; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The visual and haptic contributions to hand perception.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-13

4.  Visual detail about the body modulates tactile localisation biases.

Authors:  Aaron N Margolis; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of instrumental action on perceptual hand maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effects of immediate vision on implicit hand maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The longer the reference, the shorter the legs: How response modality affects body perception.

Authors:  Giorgia Tosi; Daniele Romano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Perceived finger orientation is biased towards functional task spaces.

Authors:  Lindsey E Fraser; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Whole-hand perceptual maps of joint location.

Authors:  Kasia A Myga; Klaudia B Ambroziak; Luigi Tamè; Alessandro Farnè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Chubby hands or little fingers: sex differences in hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.