Literature DB >> 26196650

Implicit body representations and tactile spatial remapping.

Matthew R Longo1, Flavia Mancini2, Patrick Haggard3.   

Abstract

To perceive the location of a tactile stimulus in external space (external tactile localisation), information about the location of the stimulus on the skin surface (tactile localisation on the skin) must be combined with proprioceptive information about the spatial location of body parts (position sense)--a process often referred to as 'tactile spatial remapping'. Recent research has revealed that both of these component processes rely on highly distorted implicit body representations. For example, on the dorsal hand surface position sense relies on a squat, wide hand representation. In contrast, tactile localisation on the same skin surface shows large biases towards the knuckles. These distortions can be seen as behavioural 'signatures' of these respective perceptual processes. Here, we investigated the role of implicit body representation in tactile spatial remapping by investigating whether the distortions of each of the two component processes (tactile localisation and position sense) also appear when participants localise the external spatial location of touch. Our study reveals strong distortions characteristic of position sense (i.e., overestimation of distances across vs along the hand) in tactile spatial remapping. In contrast, distortions characteristic of tactile localisation on the skin (i.e., biases towards the knuckles) were not apparent in tactile spatial remapping. These results demonstrate that a common implicit hand representation underlies position sense and external tactile localisation. Furthermore, the present findings imply that tactile spatial remapping does not require mapping the same signals in a frame of reference centred on a specific body part.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body representation; Proprioception; Somatosensory; Tactile remapping; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26196650     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  18 in total

1.  Long- but not short-term tool-use changes hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Jason P Schacher; Cory Scammel; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vestibular-somatosensory interactions affect the perceived timing of tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Stefania S Moro; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effects of instrumental action on perceptual hand maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The longer the reference, the shorter the legs: How response modality affects body perception.

Authors:  Giorgia Tosi; Daniele Romano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Chubby hands or little fingers: sex differences in hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  No Correlation between Distorted Body Representations Underlying Tactile Distance Perception and Position Sense.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Rosa Morcom
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Perceived face size in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptual and Conceptual Distortions of Implicit Hand Maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Stefania Mattioni; Nataşa Ganea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.