Sheila E Fleischhacker1, Catherine E Woteki2, Paul M Coates3, Van S Hubbard3, Grace E Flaherty4, Daniel R Glickman5, Thomas R Harkin6, David Kessler7, William W Li8, Joseph Loscalzo9, Anand Parekh10, Sylvia Rowe11, Patrick J Stover12, Angie Tagtow13, Anthony Joon Yun14, Dariush Mozaffarian4. 1. Fly Health, LLC and Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA. 2. University of Virginia Biocomplexity Institute and Initiative, Arlington, VA, USA. 3. Retired, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Gerald J and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 5. The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, USA. 6. Retired US Senator, Des Moines, IA, USA. 7. Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, College Park, MD, USA. 8. The Angiogenesis Foundation, Cambridge, MA, USA. 9. Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 10. Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, USA. 11. SR Strategy, Washington, DC, USA. 12. Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA. 13. Äkta Strategies LLC, Des Moines, IA, USA. 14. Yun Family Foundation, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The US faces remarkable food and nutrition challenges. A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition research could rapidly generate the evidence base needed to address these multiple national challenges. However, the relevant characteristics of such an effort have been uncertain. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to provide an objective, informative summary of 1) the mounting diet-related health burdens facing our nation and corresponding economic, health equity, national security, and sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechanisms for its coordination; 3) the opportunities for and potential impact of new fundamental, clinical, public health, food and agricultural, and translational scientific discoveries; and 4) the various options for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding advantages, disadvantages, and potential executive and legislative considerations. METHODS: We reviewed government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions with expert groups, advocacy organizations, and scientific societies; and held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as with a variety of other stakeholders in academic, industry, and nongovernment organizations. RESULTS: Stark national nutrition challenges were identified. More Americans are sick than are healthy, largely from rising diet-related illnesses. These conditions create tremendous strains on productivity, health care costs, health disparities, government budgets, US economic competitiveness, and military readiness. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system. More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in critical nutrition research, yet with relatively flat investments over several decades. Coordination also remains suboptimal, documented by multiple governmental reports over 50 years. Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing or rearrangement of existing investments, has tremendous potential to generate new discoveries to improve and sustain the health of all Americans. Two identified key strategies to achieve this were as follows: 1) a new authority for robust cross-governmental coordination of nutrition research and other nutrition-related policy and 2) strengthened authority, investment, and coordination for nutrition research within the NIH. These strategies were found to be complementary, together catalyzing important new science, partnerships, coordination, and returns on investment. Additional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA. CONCLUSIONS: The need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific identified options to help create the new leadership, strategic planning, coordination, and investment the nation requires to address the multiple nutrition-related challenges and grasp the opportunities before us.
BACKGROUND: The US faces remarkable food and nutrition challenges. A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition research could rapidly generate the evidence base needed to address these multiple national challenges. However, the relevant characteristics of such an effort have been uncertain. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to provide an objective, informative summary of 1) the mounting diet-related health burdens facing our nation and corresponding economic, health equity, national security, and sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechanisms for its coordination; 3) the opportunities for and potential impact of new fundamental, clinical, public health, food and agricultural, and translational scientific discoveries; and 4) the various options for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding advantages, disadvantages, and potential executive and legislative considerations. METHODS: We reviewed government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions with expert groups, advocacy organizations, and scientific societies; and held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as with a variety of other stakeholders in academic, industry, and nongovernment organizations. RESULTS: Stark national nutrition challenges were identified. More Americans are sick than are healthy, largely from rising diet-related illnesses. These conditions create tremendous strains on productivity, health care costs, health disparities, government budgets, US economic competitiveness, and military readiness. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system. More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in critical nutrition research, yet with relatively flat investments over several decades. Coordination also remains suboptimal, documented by multiple governmental reports over 50 years. Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing or rearrangement of existing investments, has tremendous potential to generate new discoveries to improve and sustain the health of all Americans. Two identified key strategies to achieve this were as follows: 1) a new authority for robust cross-governmental coordination of nutrition research and other nutrition-related policy and 2) strengthened authority, investment, and coordination for nutrition research within the NIH. These strategies were found to be complementary, together catalyzing important new science, partnerships, coordination, and returns on investment. Additional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA. CONCLUSIONS: The need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific identified options to help create the new leadership, strategic planning, coordination, and investment the nation requires to address the multiple nutrition-related challenges and grasp the opportunities before us.
Authors: Jennifer Lighter; Michael Phillips; Sarah Hochman; Stephanie Sterling; Diane Johnson; Fritz Francois; Anna Stachel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura K Cobb; Lawrence J Appel; Manuel Franco; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Alana Nur; Cheryl A M Anderson Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Marjorie L McCullough; Sicha Chantaprasopsuk; Farhad Islami; Erika Rees-Punia; Caroline Y Um; Ying Wang; Corinne R Leach; Kristen R Sullivan; Alpa V Patel Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Susan B Roberts; Rachel E Silver; Sai Krupa Das; Roger A Fielding; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Paul F Jacques; Jennifer M Kelly; Joel B Mason; Nicola M McKeown; Meaghan A Reardon; Sheldon Rowan; Edward Saltzman; Barbara Shukitt-Hale; Caren E Smith; Allen A Taylor; Dayong Wu; Fang Fang Zhang; Karen Panetta; Sarah Booth Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Emily DeWitt; Rachel Gillespie; Heather Norman-Burgdolf; Kathryn M Cardarelli; Stacey Slone; Alison Gustafson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nadine Budd Nugent; Carmen Byker Shanks; Hilary K Seligman; Hollyanne Fricke; Courtney A Parks; Sarah Stotz; Amy L Yaroch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Amelie A Hecht; Megan M Lott; Kirsten Arm; Mary T Story; Emily Snyder; Margo G Wootan; Alyssa J Moran Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 3.390