Literature DB >> 12566507

Integrated NHANES: uses in national policy.

Catherine E Woteki1.   

Abstract

The National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Program (NNMRRP) arose from Congressional concern about lack of information regarding the occurrence in the American population of undernutrition and diet-related risk factors for chronic diseases. Congressional appropriations and executive branch decisions about budget priorities have been the major determinants of the scope and number of nutrition monitoring surveys and surveillance activities fielded and therefore the information available for policy and research uses. The nutrition data collected in the NNMRRP are used by federal agencies, the private sector and academia for a variety of purposes, including public policy (e.g., development and evaluation of monitoring and surveillance, regulatory and nutrition programs), normative standards (e.g., growth charts, reference data for hematological and biochemical indicators of nutritional status or Dietary Reference Intakes) and research (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal and time-trends studies of dietary and nutritional status, health status, disease morbidity and mortality). Although the importance of the NNMRRP to national policy is difficult to quantify, in a 5-y period 97 proposed and final regulations citing NNMRRP data were published in the Federal Register by federal agencies responsible for nutrition and food safety programs. The NNMRRP-derived dietary and nutritional status data are essential information for quantitative risk assessments increasingly relied on by regulatory agencies as the basis for programmatic decisions and regulations development. Users of NNMRRP data in government agencies, academic institutions and the private sector have come to recognize the value of data from the surveys and surveillance systems for a wide variety of programmatic and research purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12566507     DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.2.582S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Health Examination Survey Methods in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, England, Scotland, and the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer S Mindell; Alison Moody; Andres I Vecino-Ortiz; Tania Alfaro; Patricia Frenz; Shaun Scholes; Silvia A Gonzalez; Paula Margozzini; Cesar de Oliveira; Luz Maria Sanchez Romero; Andres Alvarado; Sebastián Cabrera; Olga L Sarmiento; Camilo A Triana; Simón Barquera
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Challenges and Lessons Learned in Generating and Interpreting NHANES Nutritional Biomarker Data.

Authors:  Christine M Pfeiffer; David A Lacher; Rosemary L Schleicher; Clifford L Johnson; Elizabeth A Yetley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Strengthening national nutrition research: rationale and options for a new coordinated federal research effort and authority.

Authors:  Sheila E Fleischhacker; Catherine E Woteki; Paul M Coates; Van S Hubbard; Grace E Flaherty; Daniel R Glickman; Thomas R Harkin; David Kessler; William W Li; Joseph Loscalzo; Anand Parekh; Sylvia Rowe; Patrick J Stover; Angie Tagtow; Anthony Joon Yun; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method.

Authors:  Janet A Tooze; Victor Kipnis; Dennis W Buckman; Raymond J Carroll; Laurence S Freedman; Patricia M Guenther; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy.

Authors:  Namanjeet Ahluwalia; Johanna Dwyer; Ana Terry; Alanna Moshfegh; Clifford Johnson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  How Often and How Much? Differences in Dietary Intake by Frequency and Energy Contribution Vary among U.S. Adults in NHANES 2007-2012.

Authors:  Heather A Eicher-Miller; Carol J Boushey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Processed Food Contributions to Energy and Nutrient Intake Differ among US Children by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Heather A Eicher-Miller; Victor L Fulgoni; Debra R Keast
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.