Literature DB >> 32681446

Myocardial creep-induced misalignment artifacts in PET/MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Elia von Felten1, Georgios Benetos1, Dimitri Patriki1, Dominik C Benz1, Georgios P Rampidis1, Andreas A Giannopoulos1, Adam Bakula1, Christoph Gräni1, Aju P Pazhenkottil1, Catherine Gebhard1, Tobias A Fuchs1, Philipp A Kaufmann1, Ronny R Buechel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Misalignment between positron emission tomography (PET) datasets and attenuation correction (AC) maps is a potential source of artifacts in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We assessed the impact of adenosine on the alignment of AC maps derived from magnetic resonance (MR) and PET datasets during MPI on a hybrid PET/MR scanner.
METHODS: Twenty-eight volunteers underwent adenosine stress and rest 13N-ammonia MPI on a PET/MR. We acquired Dixon sequences for the creation of MRAC maps. After reconstruction of the original non-shifted PET images, we examined MRAC and PET datasets for cardiac spatial misalignment and, if necessary, reconstructed a second set of shifted PET images after manually adjusting co-registration. Summed rest, stress, and difference scores (SRS, SSS, and SDS) were compared between shifted and non-shifted PET images. Additionally, we measured the amount of cranial movement of the heart (i.e., myocardial creep) after termination of adenosine infusion.
RESULTS: Realignment was necessary for 25 (89.3%) stress and 12 (42.9%) rest PET datasets. Median SRS, SSS, and SDS of the non-shifted images were 6 (IQR = 4-7), 12 (IQR = 7-18), and 8 (IQR = 2-11), respectively, and of the shifted images 2 (IQR = 1-6), 4 (IQR = 7-18), and 1 (IQR = 0-2), respectively. All three scores were significantly higher in non-shifted versus shifted images (all p < 0.05). The difference in SDS correlated moderately but significantly with the amount of myocardial creep (r = 0.541, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Misalignment of MRAC and PET datasets commonly occurs during adenosine stress MPI on a hybrid PET/MR device, potentially leading to an increase in false-positive findings. Our results suggest that myocardial creep may substantially account for this and prompt for a careful review and correction of PET/MRAC data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Attenuation correction; Myocardial perfusion imaging; PET/MR

Year:  2020        PMID: 32681446      PMCID: PMC7835156          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04956-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  15 in total

1.  Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions.

Authors:  Catalin Loghin; Stefano Sdringola; K Lance Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; T Beyer; D Sashin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Cardiac and Respiratory Motion Correction for Simultaneous Cardiac PET/MR.

Authors:  Christoph Kolbitsch; Mark A Ahlman; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Robert Evers; Michael Hansen; Devis Peressutti; Paul Marsden; Peter Kellman; David A Bluemke; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  W T Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.

Authors:  Jan Vontobel; Riccardo Liga; Mathias Possner; Olivier F Clerc; Fran Mikulicic; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Oliver Gaemperli; Bernhard Herzog; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Technical aspects of acquiring and measuring myocardial blood flow: Method, technique, and QA.

Authors:  John R Votaw; René R Sevag Packard
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Impact of regadenoson-induced myocardial creep on dynamic Rubidium-82 PET myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  S S Koenders; J D van Dijk; P L Jager; J P Ottervanger; C H Slump; J A van Dalen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.