Christoph Kolbitsch1,2, Mark A Ahlman3, Cynthia Davies-Venn3, Robert Evers3, Michael Hansen4, Devis Peressutti5, Paul Marsden5, Peter Kellman4, David A Bluemke3, Tobias Schaeffter5,2. 1. King's College London, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom christoph.kolbitsch@ptb.de. 2. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany. 3. National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; and. 4. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. King's College London, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Cardiac PET is a versatile imaging technique providing important diagnostic information about ischemic heart diseases. Respiratory and cardiac motion of the heart can strongly impair image quality and therefore diagnostic accuracy of cardiac PET scans. The aim of this study was to investigate a new cardiac PET/MR approach providing respiratory and cardiac motion-compensated MR and PET images in less than 5 min. Methods: Free-breathing 3-dimensional MR data were acquired and retrospectively binned into multiple respiratory and cardiac motion states. Three-dimensional cardiac and respiratory motion fields were obtained with a nonrigid registration algorithm and used in motion-compensated MR and PET reconstructions to improve image quality. The improvement in image quality and diagnostic accuracy of the technique was assessed in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR scans of a canine model of myocardial infarct and was demonstrated in a human subject. Results: MR motion fields were successfully used to compensate for in vivo cardiac motion, leading to improvements in full width at half maximum of the canine myocardium of 13% ± 5%, similar to cardiac gating but with a 90% ± 57% higher contrast-to-noise ratio between myocardium and blood. Motion correction led to an improvement in MR image quality in all subjects, with an increase in sharpness of the canine coronary arteries of 85% ± 72%. A functional assessment showed good agreement with standard MR cine scans with a difference in ejection fraction of -2% ± 3%. MR-based respiratory and cardiac motion information was used to improve the PET image quality of a human in vivo scan. Conclusion: The MR technique presented here provides both diagnostic and motion information that can be used to improve MR and PET image quality. Reliable respiratory and cardiac motion correction could make cardiac PET results more reproducible.
Cardiac PET is a versatile imaging technique providing important diagnostic information about ischemic heart diseases. Respiratory and cardiac motion of the heart can strongly impair image quality and therefore diagnostic accuracy of cardiac PET scans. The aim of this study was to investigate a new cardiac PET/MR approach providing respiratory and cardiac motion-compensated MR and PET images in less than 5 min. Methods: Free-breathing 3-dimensional MR data were acquired and retrospectively binned into multiple respiratory and cardiac motion states. Three-dimensional cardiac and respiratory motion fields were obtained with a nonrigid registration algorithm and used in motion-compensated MR and PET reconstructions to improve image quality. The improvement in image quality and diagnostic accuracy of the technique was assessed in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR scans of a canine model of myocardial infarct and was demonstrated in a human subject. Results: MR motion fields were successfully used to compensate for in vivo cardiac motion, leading to improvements in full width at half maximum of the canine myocardium of 13% ± 5%, similar to cardiac gating but with a 90% ± 57% higher contrast-to-noise ratio between myocardium and blood. Motion correction led to an improvement in MR image quality in all subjects, with an increase in sharpness of the canine coronary arteries of 85% ± 72%. A functional assessment showed good agreement with standard MR cine scans with a difference in ejection fraction of -2% ± 3%. MR-based respiratory and cardiac motion information was used to improve the PET image quality of a human in vivo scan. Conclusion: The MR technique presented here provides both diagnostic and motion information that can be used to improve MR and PET image quality. Reliable respiratory and cardiac motion correction could make cardiac PET results more reproducible.
Authors: Robert Grimm; Sebastian Fürst; Michael Souvatzoglou; Christoph Forman; Jana Hutter; Isabel Dregely; Sibylle I Ziegler; Berthold Kiefer; Joachim Hornegger; Kai Tobias Block; Stephan G Nekolla Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ludovic Le Meunier; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Amit Ramesh; Louis E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Victor Cheng; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Fabian Gigengack; Lars Ruthotto; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters; Xiaoyi Jiang; Klaus P Schäfers Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: K C Wu; R J Kim; D A Bluemke; C E Rochitte; E A Zerhouni; L C Becker; J A Lima Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: F Lamare; M J Ledesma Carbayo; T Cresson; G Kontaxakis; A Santos; C Cheze Le Rest; A J Reader; D Visvikis Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Nikhil V Joshi; Alex T Vesey; Michelle C Williams; Anoop S V Shah; Patrick A Calvert; Felicity H M Craighead; Su Ern Yeoh; William Wallace; Donald Salter; Alison M Fletcher; Edwin J R van Beek; Andrew D Flapan; Neal G Uren; Miles W H Behan; Nicholas L M Cruden; Nicholas L Mills; Keith A A Fox; James H F Rudd; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Zahi A Fayad; Kathryn J Fowler; Dawn Holley; Andrei Iagaru; Alan B McMillan; Patrick Veit-Haiback; Robert J Witte; Greg Zaharchuk; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Patrick Krumm; Stefanie Mangold; Sergios Gatidis; Konstantin Nikolaou; Felix Nensa; Fabian Bamberg; Christian la Fougère Journal: Jpn J Radiol Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Tao Sun; Yoann Petibon; Paul K Han; Chao Ma; Sally J W Kim; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Manuel A Morales; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Iman Aganj; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Bruce R Rosen; Ciprian Catana Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2019-07-17
Authors: Philip M Robson; MariaGiovanna Trivieri; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Maria Padilla; Ronan Abgral; Marc R Dweck; Jason C Kovacic; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Johannes Mayer; Yining Jin; Thomas-Heinrich Wurster; Marcus R Makowski; Christoph Kolbitsch Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.226