Literature DB >> 32679272

Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Luke P O'Connor1, Alex Z Wang1, Nitin K Yerram1, Amir H Lebastchi1, Michael Ahdoot1, Sandeep Gurram1, Johnathan Zeng2, Sherif Mehralivand3, Stephanie Harmon4, Maria J Merino5, Howard L Parnes6, Peter L Choyke3, Baris Turkbey3, Bradford J Wood2, Peter A Pinto1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of combined MRI-targeted plus systematic 12-core biopsy (Cbx) to aid in the selection of patients for active surveillance (AS).
METHODS: From July 2007 to January 2020, patients with Gleason Grade Group (GG) 1 or GG 2 prostate cancer were referred to our center for AS consideration. All patients underwent an MRI and confirmatory combined MRI-targeted plus systematic biopsy (Cbx), and AS outcomes based on Cbx results were compared. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of AS failure, defined as progression to ≥ GG3 disease on follow-up biopsies.
RESULTS: Of 579 patients referred for AS, 79.3% (459/579) and 20.7% (120/579) had an initial diagnosis of GG1 and GG2 disease, respectively. Overall, 43.2% of patients (250/579) were upgraded on confirmatory Cbx, with 19.2% (111/579) upgraded to ≥ GG3. For the 226 patients followed on AS, 32.7% (74/226) had benign, 45.6% (103/226) had GG1, and 21.7% (49/226) had GG2 results on confirmatory Cbx. In total, 28.8% (65/226) of patients eventually progressed to ≥ GG3, with a median time to AS failure of 89 months. The median time from confirmatory Cbx to AS failure for the negative, GG1, and GG2 groups were 97, 97, and 32 months, respectively (p < .001). On multivariable regression, only age (hazard ratio 1.06 [1.02-1.11], p < .005) and GG on confirmatory Cbx (hazard ratio 2.75 [1.78-4.26], p < .005) remained as positive predictors of AS failure.
CONCLUSION: The confirmatory combined MRI-targeted plus systematic biopsy provides useful information for the risk stratification of patients at the time of AS enrollment.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32679272      PMCID: PMC8916164          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bloom; Graham R Hale; Samuel A Gold; Kareem N Rayn; Clayton Smith; Sherif Mehralivand; Marcin Czarniecki; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Howard L Parnes; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Daan Nieboer; Francesco Giganti; Caroline M Moore; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'Oglio; Armando Stabile; Matteo Soligo; Giorgio Brembilla; Antonio Esposito; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Federico Dehò; Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Montorsi; R Jeffrey Karnes; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 4.  Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer?

Authors:  Samuel A Gold; Graham R Hale; Jonathan B Bloom; Clayton P Smith; Kareem N Rayn; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention: using natural history to guide treatment in good risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Andrew Loblaw; Linda Sugar; Madeline Moussa; David M Berman; Theo Van der Kwast; Danny Vesprini; Laurent Milot; Marlene Kebabdjian; Neil Fleshner; Sangeet Ghai; Joe Chin; Gregory R Pond; Masoom Haider
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Andrew R Wilbur; Sarah E Reese; Amir H Lebastchi; Sherif Mehralivand; Patrick T Gomella; Jonathan Bloom; Sandeep Gurram; Minhaj Siddiqui; Paul Pinsky; Howard Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Peter L Choyke; Joanna H Shih; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Annelies Vellekoop; Hashim U Ahmed; James Catto; Mark Emberton; Robert Nam; Derek J Rosario; Vincenzo Scattoni; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin H Press; Tashzna Jones; Olamide Olawoyin; Soum D Lokeshwar; Syed N Rahman; Ghazal Khajir; Daniel W Lin; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stacy Loeb; Burcu F Darst; Yingye Zheng; Ronald C Chen; John S Witte; Tyler M Seibert; William J Catalona; Michael S Leapman; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.