Literature DB >> 15535443

Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention: using natural history to guide treatment in good risk prostate cancer.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article reviews the data supporting an approach of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for good risk localized prostate cancer. The challenge is to identify those patients who are not likely to experience significant progression, while offering radical therapy to those who are at risk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective phase 2 study of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention was initiated in 1995. Patients were treated initially with surveillance, while those who had a prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (DT) of 2 years or less, or grade progression on re-biopsy were offered radical intervention. The remainder were closely monitored.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 299 patients with good risk prostate cancer or intermediate risk prostate cancer in men older than 70 years. Median PSA DT was 7.0 years and 35% of the men had a PSA DT of greater than 10 years. The majority of patients remain on surveillance. At 8 years overall actuarial survival was 85% and disease specific survival was 99%.
CONCLUSIONS: Most men with favorable risk prostate cancer will die of unrelated causes. The approach of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention based on PSA DT represents a practical compromise between radical therapy in all, which results in overtreatment in patients with indolent disease, and watchful waiting with palliative therapy only, which results in under treatment in those with aggressive disease. Results at 8 years are favorable. Longer followup will be required to confirm the safety of this approach in men with long (greater than 15-year) life expectancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15535443     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000141712.79986.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

Review 1.  Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ho; John S P Yuen; Christopher W S Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Selective detection of histologically aggressive prostate cancer: an Early Detection Research Network Prediction model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies with validation in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Simpa Salami; Meredith M Regan; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Should Canadians be offered systematic prostate cancer screening? Yes.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Rebuttal: Should Canadians be offered systematic prostate cancer screening? YES.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Nutraceuticals in Prostate Disease: The Urologist's Role.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel; Daniel Shoskes; Claus G Roehrborn; Mark Moyad
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  What implications do the tolerability profiles of antiandrogens and other commonly used prostate cancer treatments have on patient care?

Authors:  Malcolm Mason
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Andrew J Vickers; Nicholas E Power; Samson W Fine; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Alex Mueller; Ryan K Berglund; Raj Ayyathurai; Cindy Soloway; Mark S Soloway; Robert Abouassaly; Eric A Klein; Steven J Jones; Chris Zappavigna; Larry Goldenberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.