Literature DB >> 31411973

There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies.

Paolo Dell'Oglio1, Armando Stabile2, Matteo Soligo3, Giorgio Brembilla4, Antonio Esposito4, Giorgio Gandaglia2, Nicola Fossati2, Carlo Andrea Bravi2, Federico Dehò2, Francesco De Cobelli4, Francesco Montorsi2, R Jeffrey Karnes3, Alberto Briganti2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether or not adding systematic biopsies (transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy [TRUS-Bx]) to targeted cores in patients with a lesion detected at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is still a debated topic.
OBJECTIVE: To identify patients who can avoid TRUS-Bx at the time of mpMRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) relying on individual patient probability to harbour clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) outside the index lesion (IL). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 339 European and 441 North American patients underwent fusion MRI-TBx and concomitant TRUS-Bx at two tertiary care referral centres between 2013 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The study outcome was csPCa, defined as a Gleason score at biopsy of ≥7, outside the IL. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) were performed to develop a predictive model for the study outcome. Multivariable-derived coefficients were used to develop a novel risk calculator in each cohort. The models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plot, and decision-curve analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In the European cohort, csPCa detection rate was 55%. The csPCa detection rate for TRUS-Bx was 41%. At MVAs, prostate volume, previous negative biopsy, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 4 and 5 were independent predictors for the presence of csPCa outside the IL. The multivariable model had an AUC of 0.78. Omitting TRUS-Bx in patients with a calculated risk of <15% would have spared 16% of TRUS-Bx at the cost of missing 7% of csPCa. Similar findings were obtained when the same analyses were performed in the North American cohort. No net benefit was observed for low-threshold probabilities (<15%) of the each model relative to the standard of care (performing TRUS-Bx in addition to MRI-TBx to all patients) in both cohorts. The study is limited by its retrospective design.
CONCLUSIONS: We failed to identify those patients who might safely benefit from MRI-TBx alone. The combination of MRI-TBx and TRUS-Bx should strongly be considered the best available approach. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In the presence of positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate, physicians should always perform systematic sampling of the prostate in addition to mpMRI targeted biopsy.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinically significant prostate cancer outside the index lesion; Fusion biopsy; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Random biopsy; Targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31411973     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  13 in total

1.  Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Nitin K Yerram; Amir H Lebastchi; Michael Ahdoot; Sandeep Gurram; Johnathan Zeng; Sherif Mehralivand; Stephanie Harmon; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Jung; Renzo G DiNatale; Jason Frankel; Hannah Koenig; On Ho; John Paul Flores; Christopher Porter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Francesco Barletta; Elio Mazzone; Armando Stabile; Simone Scuderi; Giorgio Brembilla; Mario de Angelis; Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli; Vito Cucchiara; Giorgio Gandaglia; R Jeffrey Karnes; Morgan Roupret; Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Dominik Deniffel; Nathan Perlis; Sangeet Ghai; Stephanie Girgis; Gerard M Healy; Neil Fleshner; Robert Hamilton; Girish Kulkarni; Ants Toi; Theodorus van der Kwast; Alexandre Zlotta; Antonio Finelli; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Detectability of prostate cancer in different parts of the gland with 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Akihiro Furuta; Akira Kido; Yuki Teramoto; Shusuke Akamatsu; Naoki Terada; Toshinari Yamasaki; Takahiro Inoue; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!

Authors:  Emanuel Darius Cata; Iulia Andras; Teodora Telecan; Attila Tamas-Szora; Radu-Tudor Coman; Dan-Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

7.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer-will the discoveries of the last 5 years change the future?

Authors:  Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

8.  Systematic sampling during MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy can overcome errors of targeting-prospective single center experience after 300 cases in first biopsy setting.

Authors:  Emanuel Cata; Iulia Andras; Matteo Ferro; Pierre Kadula; Daniel Leucuta; Gennaro Musi; Deliu-Victor Matei; Ottavio De Cobelli; Attila Tamas-Szora; Cosmin Caraiani; Andrei Lebovici; Flavia Epure; Maria Bungardean; Radu-Tudor Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

9.  Predicting the Performance of Concurrent Systematic Random Biopsies during Image Fusion Targeted Sampling of Multi-Parametric MRI Detected Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Study (PRESET Study).

Authors:  Saeed Alqahtani; Xinyu Zhang; Cheng Wei; Yilong Zhang; Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda; Jennifer Wilson; Zhihong Huang; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Analysis of the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in the detection of prostate cancer in the first systematic biopsy combined with targeted cognitive biopsy.

Authors:  Natalia Majchrzak; Piotr Cieśliński; Tomasz Milecki; Krzysztof Twardosz; Maciej Głyda; Katarzyna Karmelita-Katulska
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.