Literature DB >> 32678581

Nanofiber Technology for Regenerative Engineering.

Kenneth S Ogueri1,2, Cato T Laurencin1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Regenerative engineering is powerfully emerging as a successful strategy for the regeneration of complex tissues and biological organs using a convergent approach that integrates several fields of expertise. This innovative and disruptive approach has spurred the demands for more choice of biomaterials with distinctive biological recognition properties. An ideal biomaterial is one that closely mimics the hierarchical architecture and features of the extracellular matrices (ECM) of native tissues. Nanofabrication technology presents an excellent springboard for the development of nanofiber scaffolds that can have positive interactions in the immediate cellular environment and stimulate specific regenerative cascades at the molecular level to yield healthy tissues. This paper systematically reviews the electrospinning process technology and its utility in matrix-based regenerative engineering, focusing mainly on musculoskeletal tissues. It briefly outlines the electrospinning/three-dimensional printing system duality and concludes with a discussion on the technology outlook and future directions of nanofiber matrices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed scaffold; biodegradable polymer; biomaterial−cell interactions; drug delivery; dual-scale matrix; electrospinning; electrospun nanofiber; stem cells; sustained release; tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32678581      PMCID: PMC7484273          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  76 in total

1.  Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Jeannine M Coburn; Matthew Gibson; Sean Monagle; Zachary Patterson; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Micro- and nanofabrication of chitosan structures for regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Meng Deng; Roshan James; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Generational Biodegradable and Regenerative Polyphosphazene Polymers and their Blends with Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid).

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 29.190

4.  The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers.

Authors:  Zi Yin; Xiao Chen; Jia Lin Chen; Wei Liang Shen; Thi Minh Hieu Nguyen; Ling Gao; Hong Wei Ouyang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Nanofiber diameter-dependent MAPK activity in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Devina Jaiswal; Justin L Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING: APPROACHES TO LIMB REGENERATION AND OTHER GRAND CHALLENGES.

Authors:  Cato T Laurencin; Lakshmi S Nair
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-04

Review 7.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Encapsulation of amoxicillin within laponite-doped poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers: preparation, characterization, and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Shige Wang; Fuyin Zheng; Yunpeng Huang; Yuting Fang; Mingwu Shen; Meifang Zhu; Xiangyang Shi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 9.  Nanofiber-based delivery of bioactive agents and stem cells to bone sites.

Authors:  Zhanpeng Zhang; Jiang Hu; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Biodegradable Polyphosphazene-Based Blends for Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Jorge L Escobar Ivirico; Lakshmi S Nair; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Enhancing osteoblast differentiation through small molecule-incorporated engineered nanofibrous scaffold.

Authors:  Maria Akhtar; Kyung Mi Woo; Muhammad Tahir; Wenhui Wu; Jeevithan Elango; Munazza R Mirza; Maryam Khan; Saba Shamim; Praveen R Arany; Saeed Ur Rahman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Scaffold-Free Spheroids with Two-Dimensional Heteronano-Layers (2DHNL) Enabling Stem Cell and Osteogenic Factor Codelivery for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; Linli Li; Bipin Gaihre; Sungjo Park; Yong Li; Andre Terzic; Benjamin D Elder; Lichun Lu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 18.027

3.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Regenerative Capability of Glycylglycine Ethyl Ester-Substituted Polyphosphazene and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Blends: A Rabbit Critical-Sized Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Kennedy S Ogueri; Aneesah McClinton; Ho-Man Kan; Chinedu C Ude; Mohammed A Barajaa; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  A Trilayer Dressing with Self-Pumping and pH Monitoring Properties for Promoting Abdominal Wall Defect Repair.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Guopu Chen; Gefei Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 5.  A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds.

Authors:  M Sai Bhargava Reddy; Deepalekshmi Ponnamma; Rajan Choudhary; Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.